MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406760262 · doi:10.1093/jacamr/dlae217.004

O04 Use of the novel antifungal rezafungin in outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy: early experience from a single centre

2025· article· en· W4406760262 on OpenAlexaff
Harriet Davidson, I Dunstan, Ting Yau, Alasdair I. Houston, Marina Basarab, Tihana Bicanic

Bibliographic record

VenueJAC-Antimicrobial Resistance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNail Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntifungalAntibioticsMedicineIntensive care medicineMicrobiologyDermatologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Rezafungin is a novel long-acting echinocandin antifungal drug with weekly dosing, which was licensed for treatment of invasive candidiasis in the UK in January 2024. We report on the early use of rezafungin in our outpatient parental antibiotic therapy (OPAT) service. Objectives To review indications, treatment regimens, outcomes and adverse events in adult patients receiving rezafungin at a tertiary infectious disease centre. Methods All adult patients who received rezafungin therapy via the OPAT service since it was added to the hospital formulary in July 2024 were included. Patient demographics, infection diagnosis, treatment regimens and outcomes were recorded. A single dose of rezafungin was assumed to be equivalent to seven doses of a comparable echinocandin (e.g. anidulafungin). Results Five patients (age range 30–80 years) received rezafungin therapy between July 2024 and October 2024. A total of 18 doses were administered. The median course length was 4 doses (range: 2–5). One patient received two courses of rezafungin as part of a planned series, otherwise patients received a single course. Indications for treatment were Candida osteomyelitis, recurrent mucocutaneous candidiasis (3 oral/oesophageal, 2 resistant or refractory to fluconazole; 1 drug interactions), and pulmonary aspergilloma (cyclical use: 2 weeks’ course every 8 weeks, in combination with voriconazole due to progression on monotherapy). Reasons for choosing rezafungin over daily echinocandins were patient preference/convenience, facilitating earlier patient discharge (1 case) and cost effectiveness compared with the cost of daily caspofungin administration by the OPAT nurses. Underlying conditions predisposing to fungal infection were diabetes mellitus (3), immunosuppression secondary to liver transplantation, STAT1 gain-of-function mutation and multisystem sarcoidosis on long-term prednisolone. All patients with mucocutaneous candidiasis reported a treatment response; treatment in the patient with aspergilloma and the patient with osteomyelitis is ongoing. Regarding treatment-emergent adverse reactions: there were no cases of pyrexia, hypokalaemia, pneumonia or septic shock (the most common AEs in reported in the RESTORE trial). One hundred and nine doses of equivalent echinocandin were saved through once weekly dosing. Conclusions Early use of rezafungin at our centre suggests it is a well-tolerated, convenient and useful addition to the antifungal armamentarium, particularly in the outpatient setting. Monitoring of blood tests is essential, particularly haemoglobin, renal function and electrolytes, including magnesium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAC-Antimicrobial ResistanceSame topicNail Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207