MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406769574 · doi:10.4324/9781003404491-6

Genocide-Informed Awareness

2025· book-chapter· en· W4406769574 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tamara A. Starblanket

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Geopolitics and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenocidePsychologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter is a critique and expository of colonialism, epistemology, pedagogy, and praxis of higher education and its role in concealing the horror our children and Peoples and Nations have endured for over a century and counting. Genocide-informed awareness is necessary to understand the impact of the crime of genocide – forcibly transferring Indigenous Peoples’ children into residential institutions and causing the collective serious bodily and mental destruction. The post-secondary education system is complicit in masking the reality of the Canadian state’s intent to destroy and the devastation of the crime on Indigenous Peoples and Nations. Genocide-informed awareness is needed to understand how words oppress and maintain domination and dehumanization. The forcible transfers nearly wiped out our cultural, spiritual, and national identities as human groups, not individuals, and the effects of this colonial destruction continue to mount intergenerationally with no end in sight. More importantly, Indigenous Peoples require this understanding so that we heal. We are not subparts of this colonial state; we are national groups to be protected by the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Another note is that I write as a nehiyaw/cree iskwew/woman in the first person. Genocide is an act of colonial violence against my people and Indigenous Peoples across our Great Turtle Island.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAsian Geopolitics and EthnographyFrench-language works237,207