MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406780125 · doi:10.1097/paf.0000000000001020

Intrauterine and Neonatal Deaths

2025· article· en· W4406780125 on OpenAlexaff
Zachary Alan Wilkinson, K. Nicole Weaver, Thomas Gilson, Alison Krywanczyk

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsOffice of the Chief Medical Examiner
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObstetricsIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Forensic investigation of intrauterine and perinatal deaths can be challenging, given their relative infrequency and the possible involvement of maternal substance use, trauma, and socioeconomic factors. Intrauterine and perinatal deaths investigated by the Cuyahoga County Medical Examiner's Officer between 2013-2023 were reviewed. One hundred twenty-eight cases were identified (83 stillborn and 45 live births). The predominant indications for referral were concern for maternal substance use (57.8%) or trauma (35.2%). Gestational ages ranged from 11.5 to 42.5 weeks; 36.7% were <22 weeks, and only 10.2% were full term (>37 weeks). The maternal age range was 16-41 years, with most (65.2%) between 20-34 years. Not all case files included obstetric history or home address; of those which did, 53.0% received no prenatal care and 81.7% came from zip codes in the bottom quartile of household incomes. Causes of death included acute and/or chronic maternal substance use (28.9%), chorioamnionitis (21.9%), and abruption (19.5%). Manners of death (when applicable) included natural (53.3%), accident (26.7%), homicide (8.9%), and undetermined/unassigned (11.1%). Potentially confounding socioeconomic factors were identified in most cases. This demonstrates the importance of considering these factors and exercising caution when assigning specific causes and manners to intrauterine and perinatal deaths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Forensic Medicine & PathologySame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207