Encyclopédie des communautés et pratiques communautaires. Extraits choisis, édition 2025
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Encyclopédie des communautés et pratiques communautaires propose un corpus inédit de connaissances sur les sources, formes et modes d’organisations collaboratives et collectives d’hier, d’aujourd’hui et de demain. Rassemblant des spécialistes internationaux de diverses disciplines, dont le droit, la sociologie, l’économie ou les sciences de la gestion, cet ouvrage de référence constitue une ressource précieuse pour comprendre et analyser les fondements et fonctionnements des communautés qui imaginent de nouvelles façons de vivre ensemble. Ainsi les communautés dont il est question ici sont celles qui s’articulent autour de trois axes : la défense d’un intérêt communautaire, comme la protection d’un espace naturel ; le partage d’un bien privatif ou commun, comme les habitats participatifs ; ou encore la production des connaissances, telle l’encyclopédie Wikipédia. Publiée en libre accès, cette encyclopédie évolutive, dont sont présentés ici les premiers extraits, a vocation à s’enrichir continuellement sous la supervision d’un comité scientifique international et pluridisciplinaire, afin d’offrir une vision plurielle et engagée des communautés et pratiques communautaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.256 | 0.176 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".