Orismilast, a phosphodiesterase 4B/D inhibitor, in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: efficacy and safety from a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled phase IIb dose-ranging study (ADESOS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by eczematous skin lesions and pruritus. There is an unmet need for effective first-line systemic treatments with good safety profiles, particularly oral medications. Orismilast is a novel first-in-class oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) B/D inhibitor under investigation for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the optimal dose, efficacy and safety of twice-daily orismilast in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: This 16-week, multicentre randomized placebo-controlled phase IIb dose-ranging study (NCT05469464) included patients from 48 centres in Europe and the USA. Adults with moderate-to-severe AD were given (1 : 1 : 1 : 1) orismilast 20 mg, 30 mg or 40 mg, or placebo, twice daily. The primary endpoint was percentage change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI); the secondary endpoints (all at week 16) included achievement of a score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) with ≥ 2-point improvement on the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA 0/1); achievement of a Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) reduction of ≥ 4 points; and achievement of a reduction in EASI of 75%, 90% and 100% from baseline. RESULTS: Overall, 233 patients were randomly assigned to orismilast 20 mg (n = 58), 30 mg (n = 61), 40 mg (n = 59) or placebo (n = 55). At week 16, reductions in EASI (percentage points) from baseline to week 16 were seen across orismilast groups and placebo (P > 0.05 for orismilast vs. placebo). Significantly more patients achieved IGA 0/1 with a ≥ 2-point improvement with orismilast 20 mg and 40 mg compared with placebo (P < 0.05). Significantly greater proportions of patients achieving a ≥ 4-point reduction in PP-NRS were demonstrated with orismilast at week 2. The safety profile was consistent with that of the PDE4 class, with no major safety concerns reported. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the clinical relevance of selective PDE4B/D inhibition with orismilast, potentially offering a convenient, novel oral therapy for the treatment of AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".