Safety of ceftobiprole in patients with impaired renal, hepatic or immune function: A multinational retrospective hospital chart review (RETRACE study)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Ceftobiprole, an advanced-generation cephalosporin with broad bactericidal activity, is approved for community-acquired and hospital-acquired pneumonia (excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia). We aimed to evaluate, in a real-world setting, the safety profile of ceftobiprole in patients with risk conditions (severe renal impairment, hepatic impairment, and immunocompromised status), groups excluded from clinical trials. METHODS: In this retrospective study (NCT04170309), 396 consecutive charts of patients treated with ceftobiprole during 2016-2022 in 15 centres in France, Italy, and Spain were analysed: 62 had severe renal impairment, 51 had a hepatic impairment, 120 were immunocompromised, and 203 had no predefined risk condition (controls). RESULTS: Ceftobiprole was used for off-label indications in 110/396 (27.8%) patients; 46/396 (11.6%) patients received a higher-than-recommended dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) considered as ceftobiprole-related occurred in 44 patients, more frequently in the risk groups compared to controls (severe renal impairment: 8/62 [12.9%]; hepatic impairment: 7/51 [13.7%]; immunocompromised: 19/120 [15.8%]; controls: 15/203, [7.4%]); in 7/44 patients, these events were serious. Compared to controls, liver-related AEs occurred more frequently in the impaired hepatic function (17/51 [33.3%] vs. 22/203 [10.8%], odds ratio [OR:]: 4.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.98-8.55) and immunocompromised (30/120 [25.0%] vs. 22/203 [10.8%], OR: 2.74; 95% CI: 1.50-5.02) groups. Hyponatremia was also more frequent in immunocompromised patients than controls (14/120 [11.7%] vs. 9/203 [4.4%], OR: 2.85; 95% CI: 1.19-6.80). Underlying disease, concomitant medications and the poor health status of the patients likely affected these imbalances. CONCLUSION: Overall, no new safety concerns related to ceftobiprole use in real-world patients with severe renal impairment, hepatic impairment or immunocompromised status were identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".