MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406788336 · doi:10.3791/67431

Fabricating and Labeling Microbubbles with Fluorescent and Radioactive Tracers

2025· article· en· W4406788336 on OpenAlexaff
Maneesha A. Rajora, Chelsea Leung, Juan Chen, Zheng Gang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Visualized Experiments · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobubblesFluorescenceFluorescent labellingRadiochemistryBiophysicsChemistryBiologyMedicinePhysicsUltrasoundOpticsRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microbubbles are lipid-shelled, gas-filled particles that have evolved from vascular ultrasound contrast agents into revolutionary cancer therapy platforms. When combined with therapeutic focused ultrasound (FUS), they can safely and locally overcome physiological barriers (e.g., blood-brain barrier), deliver drugs to otherwise inaccessible cancers (e.g., glioblastoma and pancreatic cancer), and treat neurodegenerative diseases. The therapeutic arsenal of microbubble-FUS is advancing in new directions, including synergistic combination radiotherapy, multimodal imaging, and all-in-one drug loading and delivery from microbubble shells. Labeling microbubbles with radiotracers is key to establishing these expanded theranostic capabilities. However, existing microbubble radiolabeling strategies rely on purification methodologies known to perturb microbubble physicochemical properties, use short-lived radioisotopes, and do not always yield stable chelation. Collectively, this creates ambiguity surrounding the accuracy of microbubble radioimaging and the efficiency of tumor radioisotope delivery. This protocol describes a new one-pot, purification-free microbubble labeling methodology that preserves microbubble physicochemical properties while achieving >95% radioisotope chelation efficiency. It is versatile and can be applied successfully across custom and commercial microbubble formulations with differing acyl lipid chain length, charge, and chelator/probe (porphyrin, DTPA, DiI) composition. It can be adaptively applied during ground-up microbubble fabrication and to pre-made microbubble formulations with modular customizability of fluorescence and multimodal fluorescence/radioactive properties. Accordingly, this flexible method enables the production of tailored, traceable (radio, fluorescent, or radio/fluorescent active) multimodal microbubbles that are useful for advancing mechanistic, imaging, and therapeutic microbubble-FUS applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Visualized ExperimentsSame topicCardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207