MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406788641 · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2025.117429

Effects of triple-frequency orthogonal ultrasound-assisted freezing on the quality properties of large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea)

2025· article· en· W4406788641 on OpenAlexaff
Weihao Yang, Zhilong Xu, Jun Mei, Jing Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueLWT · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMeat and Animal Product Quality
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaAgriculture Research System of China
KeywordsQuality (philosophy)FisheryBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultrasound-assisted freezing (UAF) is a new freezing technology that combines ultrasonic sound field with immersion freezing. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of triple-frequency orthogonal ultrasound-assisted freezing (TOUAF) on the quality of large yellow croaker ( Larimichthys crocea ). The results showed that TOUAF at horizontal 20 and 28 kHz + vertical 40 kHz (TOUAF-20(H)28(H)40(V)) significantly increased the freezing rate, enhanced the water holding capacity (83.68%), and effectively minimized water migration. TOUAF-20(H)28(H)40(V) effectively reduced the TBA (0.084 mg MDA/kg) and TVB-N value (9.65 mg N/100 g), which improved the solubility of proteins, reduced the surface hydrophobicity, and effectively protected the structural integrity of proteins and reduced protein aggregation. It can effectively slow down lipid oxidation and protein degradation. The research showed that TOUAF could effectively slow down the quality degradation of frozen yellow croaker compared with horizontal multi-frequency ultrasound freezing which is more commonly used at present. • TOUAF combines multi-frequency UAF with orthogonal modes. • TOUAF significantly increases the freezing rate. • TOUAF improves the quality of frozen large yellow croaker. • TOUAF-20(H)28(H)40(V) reduces negative effects including thermal effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLWTSame topicMeat and Animal Product QualityFrench-language works237,207