MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406789015 · doi:10.1101/2025.01.21.634187

Proteomic Analysis of Breast Cancer Subtypes Identifies Stromal Protein Profiles that Contribute to Aggressive Malignant Behavior

2025· preprint· en· W4406789015 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan B. Burton, Philippe Gascard, Deng Pan, Joanna Bons, Rosemary Bai, Chira Chen‐Tanyolac, Joseph A. Caruso, Christie L. Hunter, Birgit Schilling, Thea D. Tlsty

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsSciex (Canada)
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute on AgingBuck Institute for Research on Aging
KeywordsStromal cellBreast cancerCancerComputational biologyOncologyCancer researchMedicineBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast cancer manifests as multiple subtypes with distinct patient outcomes and treatment strategies. Here, we optimized proteomic analysis of Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) specimens from patients diagnosed with five breast cancer subtypes, luminal A, luminal B, Her2, triple negative (TNBC) and metaplastic breast cancers (MBC), and from disease-free individuals undergoing reduction mammoplasty (RM). We identified and quantified ∼6,000 protein groups (with >2 peptides per protein) with significant changes in over 26% of proteins comparing each cancer subtype with control RM. Stringent statistical filters allowed us to deeply mine 576 significant conserved protein changes shared by all subtypes and protein changes unique to each subtype. The most aggressive subtype, MBC, revealed exacerbated stromal stress responses, as illustrated by a collagenolytic extracellular matrix (ECM) and immune participation biased towards neutrophils and eosinophils. Immunostaining of breast tissue sections confirmed differences across subtypes, in particular, a strong upregulation of SERPINH1, neutrophil-specific myeloperoxidase and eosinophil cationic protein in MBC. In summary, we present deep proteomic, digitalized protein abundance profiles, generated from FFPE breast cancer tissues, that revealed significant changes in ECM and cellular proteins. Statement of Significance of the Study: This study is significant as it discovered deep proteomic signatures for the highly aggressive and malignant metaplastic breast cancer (MCB) which is now considered a fifth subtype based upon its remarkable intra-tumoral heterogeneity that illustrates its unique cell plasticity. To efficiently analyze formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast tissues from patients with different breast cancer subtypes and disease-free individuals, we optimized a novel workflow in which we combined paraffinization and Folch extraction. We identified and confidently quantified ∼6,000 protein groups. We were able to find robust changes in extracellular matrix (ECM) with cancer, even though no ECM enrichments were performed. Interestingly, despite the relatively small human cohort size (42 patients), distinct protein signatures emerged throughout all cancer subtypes - common and unique - with remarkable statistical significance for many cancer-relevant proteins and pathways. This Pilot study indicates the hypothesis that an altered stroma can dictate epithelial tumor cell fate. We also observed that MBC was characterized by an especially immunosuppressed tumor environment. We do note the limitation of the relatively small cohort size of our study, and in the future additional patient cohorts will be needed to further validate our findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207