MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406795689 · doi:10.1080/00207721.2025.2456028

Static output feedback strategy for mean-field social control with nonlinear stochastic dynamics

2025· article· en· W4406795689 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Systems Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemDynamics (music)Control (management)Field (mathematics)Feedback controlOutput feedbackNonlinear controlComputer scienceMathematicsControl engineeringEngineeringPsychologyPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mean-field social control problem for uncertain nonlinear stochastic systems is investigated by using a robust static output feedback (SOF) strategy. First, the problem in the single decision maker case is investigated in terms of guaranteed cost control approaches to derive suboptimal conditions at the supremum of the cost function. The Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) condition is used to derive the necessary conditions which are expressed as a large stochastic combined matrix equation (SCME). Second, the preliminary results in the single decision maker case are used to study the Pareto optimal strategy in a cooperative game. As our main contribution, we derive the high-order centralised strategies and the low-order decentralised strategies, respectively, for the cooperative game. In order to avoid the difficulty of higher-order dimensional problem related to SCMEs, a new reduced-order decomposition numerical scheme by means of Newton's method is developed. The computation for designing the proposed strategy set can be performed in low dimension, even when the number of decision makers approachs to infinity. Moreover, the degradation of the cost function is rigorously evaluated by comparing the centralised strategy set with the proposed strategy set. Finally, several numerical experiments are conducted to demonstrate the usefulness and effectiveness of the proposed strategy set.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it