MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406801676 · doi:10.1186/s12966-025-01712-z

Effects of physical activity on depressive and anxiety symptoms of women in the menopausal transition and menopause: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2025· review· en· W4406801676 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hongyu Yue, Yijiao Yang, Fangfang Xie, Jiahe Cui, Li Yang, Mengran Si, Shanshan Li, Fei Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineMenopauseMeta-analysisAnxietyRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineCochrane LibraryCINAHLDepression (economics)Subgroup analysisPhysical therapyGynecologyPsychiatryPsychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Depression and anxiety may significantly affect women in the menopausal transition and menopause. In addition to traditional treatment strategies such as hormone therapy, antidepressants, and psychotherapy, physical activity (PA) have been increasingly studied, but there is no consensus about their role in menopausal women with depression and anxiety. Objective The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of PA on the severity of depressive (DS) and anxiety (AS) symptoms in women during the menopausal transition and menopause. Methods We searched for relevant published studies in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL prior to 8 April 2024, focusing on randomized controlled trials documenting the effect of physical activity on DS and AS, and assessed study quality using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results The data used for meta-analysis were derived from 21 studies (DS, n = 9; AS, n = 1; DS and AS combined, n = 11) involving 2020 participants. The results showed that PA groups demonstrated a statistically significant effect of depressive symptoms versus controls (DS [SMD: -0.66, 95% CI: -0.99 to -0.33; P < 0.001]; AS [SMD: -0.55, 95% CI: -0.82 to -0.27; P < 0.001]). As subgroup analyses demonstrated, physical exercise also reduced depressive symptom of women in menopausal status (SMD =-0.56, 95% CI: −0.96 to − 0.17, p = 0.006, I 2 = 69%), postmenopausal status (SMD =-0.94, 95% CI: −1.46 to − 0.42, p = 0.0004, I 2 = 94%), and both in menopausal transition and postmenopausal status (SMD =-0.30, 95% CI: −0.49 to − 0.12, p = 0.001, I 2 = 0%), while it only reduced anxiety symptom of postmenopausal women (SMD =-0.96, 95% CI: −1.49 to − 0.43, p = 0.0004, I 2 = 89%). Low-intensity and moderate-intensity exercise both produced increasingly benefits over depressive and anxiety symptoms. However, there is no statistically significant effect of exercise intensity on both depressive symptom and anxiety symptom. Conclusion Physical activities with low to moderate intensity can impart remarkable improvements for managing menopausal women with depression and anxiety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0230.031
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical ActivitySame topicMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207