Comparing the Palmar Radiocarpal Artery Vascularized Bone Graft with Alternatives for Unstable Scaphoid Nonunions: A Retrospective Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: We compared the radiographic union and magnitude of humpback deformity correction when using different vascularized bone grafts (VBGs) and nonvascularized bone grafts (NVBGs) in the treatment of unstable scaphoid nonunions (USNUs). METHODS: This was a retrospective radiographic review of 93 patients with an USNU treated between 2013 and 2022 at a single center by a single surgeon. Inclusion criteria included skeletally mature patients with radiographic evidence of an USNU resulting from failure of either nonsurgical or operative treatment. There were three treatment groups. Two groups were treated with either a palmar radiocarpal artery (PRCA) VBG or a 1,2 intercompartmental supraretinacular (1,2 IC-SRA) VBG. The third group comprised patients who were treated with a heterogeneous mix of NVBGs. Patients were followed radiographically at regular intervals until they were deemed healed or underwent a salvage procedure because of treatment failure. Measurements of carpal and scaphoid alignment were then repeated on the final imaging series and compared to preoperative measurements. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included in the final analysis. PRCA VBG had the highest radiographic union rate, followed by 1,2 IC-SRA VBG and finally NVBGs. PRCA VBG had a significantly higher rate of union than NVBGs. Scapholunate angle change and scaphoid length change were greatest with PRCA VBG. These differences were statistically significant for the former when compared with 1,2 IC-SRA VBG and NVBGs and for the latter when compared with the 1,2 IC-SRA VBG in both univariate and multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: PRCA VBG had the highest radiographic union rate compared with alternative grafts as well as providing the greatest degree of humpback deformity correction in the treatment of USNUs. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".