MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406804936 · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.2636

UltraTimTrack: a Kalman-filter-based algorithm to track muscle fascicles in ultrasound image sequences

2025· article· en· W4406804936 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePeerJ Computer Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterTrack (disk drive)Computer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmImage (mathematics)UltrasoundAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Brightness-mode (B-mode) ultrasound is a valuable tool to non-invasively image skeletal muscle architectural changes during movement, but automatically tracking muscle fascicles remains a major challenge. Existing fascicle tracking algorithms either require time-consuming drift corrections or yield noisy estimates that require post-processing. We therefore aimed to develop an algorithm that tracks fascicles without drift and with low noise across a range of experimental conditions and image acquisition settings. Methods: = 8, four women), who performed cyclical submaximal plantar flexion contractions or remained at rest during passive ankle joint rotations at given frequencies and amplitudes whilst seated in a dynamometer chair. We quantified the algorithm's tracking accuracy, noise, and drift as the respective mean, cycle-to-cycle variability, and accumulated between-contraction variability in fascicle length and fascicle angle. We expected UltraTimTrack's estimates to be less noisy than TimTrack's estimates and to drift less than UltraTrack's estimates across a range of conditions and image acquisition settings. Results: The proposed algorithm yielded low-noise estimates like UltraTrack and was drift-free like TimTrack across the broad range of conditions we tested. Over 120 cyclical contractions, fascicle length and fascicle angle deviations of UltraTimTrack accumulated to 2.1 ± 1.3 mm (mean ± sd) and 0.8 ± 0.7 deg, respectively. This was considerably less than UltraTrack (67.0 ± 59.3 mm, 9.3 ± 8.6 deg) and similar to TimTrack (1.9 ± 2.2 mm, 0.9 ± 1.0 deg). Average cycle-to-cycle variability of UltraTimTrack was 1.4 ± 0.4 mm and 0.6 ± 0.3 deg, which was similar to UltraTrack (1.1 ± 0.3 mm, 0.5 ± 0.1 deg) and less than TimTrack (3.5 ± 1.0 mm, 1.4 ± 0.5 deg). UltraTimTrack was less affected by experimental conditions and image acquisition settings than its parent algorithms. It also yielded similar or lower root-mean-square deviations from manual tracking for previously published image sequences (fascicle length: 2.3-2.6 mm, fascicle angle: 0.8-0.9 deg) compared with a recently-proposed hybrid algorithm (4.7 mm, 0.9 deg), and the recently-proposed DL_Track algorithm (3.8 mm, 3.9 deg). Furthermore, UltraTimTrack's processing time (0.2 s per image) was at least five times shorter than that of these recently-proposed algorithms. Conclusion: We developed a Kalman-filter-based algorithm to improve fascicle tracking from B-mode ultrasound image sequences. The proposed algorithm provides low-noise, drift-free estimates of muscle architectural changes that may better inform muscle function interpretations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it