MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406807603 · doi:10.1016/j.nupar.2024.12.001

Supplémentation des mélanges de nutrition parentérale à domicile : recommandations de bonnes pratiques par consensus formalisé

2025· article· fr· W4406807603 on OpenAlexaff
Romane Chapuis, Marjorie Durand, Constance Chevrier, Eva Wilsius, P Boivin, Olivia Dauriac, Philippe Fayemendy, Nicolas Flori, Nadia Gastaut, Roseline Mazet, Sébastien Neuville, Emmanuelle Olivier, T. Quessada, Jeanick Stocco, J. Bataille, S. Schneider

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrition Clinique et Métabolisme · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldNursing
TopicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.269
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.487
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2690.487
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.009
Bibliometrics0.0130.008
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0170.011
Open science0.0080.013
Research integrity0.0090.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrition Clinique et MétabolismeSame topicClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyFrench-language works237,207