MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406807976 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.200127

Assessing the Technological and Financial Feasibility of PV-Wind Hybrid Systems for EV Charging Stations on Indonesian Toll Roads

2025· article· en· W4406807976 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mochamad Subchan Mauludin, Moh. Khairudin, Rustam Asnawi, Yuki Trisnoaji, Singgih Dwi Prasetyo, Rayie Tariaranie Wiraguna

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTollIndonesianBusinessFinancePhotovoltaic systemToll roadEnvironmental economicsWind powerMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceEngineeringEconomicsElectrical engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research evaluates the planning and development of a hybrid renewable energy system that combines photovoltaic (PV) panels and wind turbines for electric vehicle (EV) charging stations along the Cipali, Semarang-Solo, and Surabaya-Mojokerto highways.As energy demands rise and sustainability becomes increasingly recognized, incorporating renewable energy sources is vital for diminishing reliance on fossil fuels.By employing HOMER Pro software, the study analyzes this hybrid approach's operational performance and economic practicality, emphasizing key metrics such as Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Return on Investment (ROI), and Payback Period.The findings reveal that the PV-Wind hybrid system reduces energy expenses and improves the efficiency and sustainability of EV charging infrastructure.Notably, the Surabaya -Mojokerto site displays the most favorable outcomes, featuring an IRR surpassing 25% and the shortest payback period of four years.These results underscore the critical role of effective management, strategic planning, and sustainable development of renewable energy systems to bolster environmentally conscious transportation infrastructure in Indonesia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207