Policy Design for Independent Integrated City Development Based on Environmental Carrying Capacity in Lunang Silaut Area, Indonesia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to explain the development policy of Lunang Silaut Independent Integrated City (LSICC), Indonesia, from the perspective of environmental carrying capacity.The assessment of environmental carrying capacity is carried out through an indicative methodology based on the units of analysis, parameters, indicators, and benchmarks related to each unit of analysis.The results of the study indicate that the social carrying capacity of the LSICC is good, which indicates that has effectively carried out its role in community service.Through the analysis of the development scenario of the LSIIC, both in the short term (2030) and long term (2040), it can be seen that there are critical factors related to the sustainability of its development, namely population pressure.Given the importance of understanding environmental carrying capacity for the sustainability of regional development, the Pesisir Selatan Regency Government together with the West Sumatra Provincial Government is advised to conduct research on the environmental carrying capacity of LSIIC periodically every year as an effort to monitor regional development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it