Bibliographic record
Abstract
La editorial "Contracorrientes para el Buen Vivir: Explorando el pluriverso de las ingenierías" de esta edición de la revista presenta una crítica a la ingeniería contemporánea, la cual se ha enfocado en la eficiencia y ha estado desconectada de su entorno, exacerbando desigualdades sociales y alterando ciclos naturales. A través de una serie de entrevistas, artículos, reseñas y cuentos, se exploran alternativas que buscan rediseñar la tecnología y la ingeniería para que respondan a las necesidades locales y mejoren las condiciones de vida de las comunidades. Se destaca la importancia de la interdisciplinariedad, la ética y la solidaridad en la práctica de la ingeniería, proponiendo un enfoque que priorice el Buen Vivir y la justicia social en un contexto global marcado por el consumismo y el cambio climático. La edición también incluye una entrevista con el profesor John Kleba, quien discute el papel de la ingeniería hegemónica y su impacto en las comunidades desfavorecidas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".