Functional Heterogeneity in Non-Suicidal Self-Injury across Psychiatric Disorders: Neural and Psychosocial Correlates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a common behavior among adolescents, particularly within psychiatric populations. While neurobiological and psychosocial risk factors have been extensively studied, the mechanisms underlying NSSI’s heterogeneity remain unclear. This study investigated 304 hospitalized adolescents/young adults (16–25 years) with NSSI and comorbid psychiatric diagnoses (major depressive disorder [MDD], bipolar disorder [BD], eating disorders [ED]) using psychological assessments and resting-state fMRI data from 163 participants. Orthogonal projection non-negative matrix factorization of Ottawa Self-Injury Inventory responses identified two core motivational dimensions: self-related (emotional regulation) and social-related (interpersonal influence). The self-related factor correlated with amygdala-centered cortico-limbic emotional regulation networks and predominated in affective disorders (MDD/BD), while the social-related factor linked to frontoparietal cognitive control and frontotemporal social cognition networks, particularly in ED. Fuzzy C-means clustering revealed three NSSI functional subtypes, independent of diagnostic categories : self-subtype primarily driven by self-related functions, social-subtype influenced by both self- and social-related functions with greater exposure to psychosocial risks, and non-specific subtype with undifferentiated motivations. No subtype was exclusively driven by social-related functions. The “self-social” dual-dimensional neural model demonstrated distinct subtype-specific profiles in functional connectivity, psychosocial risk exposure, and clinical features. Self-related mechanisms primarily engaged emotional regulation circuits, whereas social-related mechanisms emphasize the role of psychosocial risk factors and cognitive-emotional circuits. These findings provide neural evidence for the functional heterogeneity of NSSI and highlight the need for personalized interventions. Treatments targeting emotion regulation may benefit all subtypes, individuals with prominent social-related motivations may additionally require interventions aimed at improving interpersonal functioning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".