Synaptome architecture shapes regional dynamics in the mouse brain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synapses are the connections that transform neurons from simple electrically charged cells into complex circuits that support perception, cognition and action. Recent advances in single-punctum synapse mapping in mice have made it possible to study the diversity of synapses and how these synapse types are differentially expressed across the brain. A salient question is how synapse diversity shapes the spatial patterning of whole-brain dynamics. Here we derive > 6 000 time-series features from fMRI recordings in awake mice to construct a comprehensive macroscale dynamical phenotype of each synapse type. We find that spatial variation in synapse types colocalizes with spatial variation in regional dynamics. Time-series in regions enriched for SAP102-expressing synapses display high-amplitude events while time-series in regions enriched for PSD95-expressing synapses display low stationarity. These regional variations in synapse types and dynamics are associated with patterns of structural and functional connectivity and the placement of hubs. Finally, using two additional fMRI datasets in anaesthetized mice, we show that synapses expressing short- and long-lifetime proteins are differentially engaged across behavioural states. Collectively, this work demonstrates that the spatial organization of microscale synapse types fundamentally shapes whole-brain dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".