A Comparative Study on Repair of Canine Femoral Fractures Using Titanium and Stainless Steel Intramedullary Interlocking Nail
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present comparative clinical study in twelve dogs age ranged from 5 to 24 months.Six were male and six were female, among them 4 Mongrels (33.33%), two Labrador retrievers (16.6%), one each of Golden retriever (8.3%), German shepherd (8.3%), Mudhol hound (8.3%), Saint bernard (8.3%), Siberian husky (8.3%), and Pomeranian (8.3%).The body weight ranges from 11 to 42 kg.50% of dogs had femur fractures due to automobile accidents, 33.33% had due to slipping on the floor, fallen from height (8.33%), fight between dogs (8.33%),and wild animal attack (8.33%).Lameness grading in the two groups pre-operatively showed grade V lameness.After surgical stabilization in group I (stainless steel IILN) the mean lameness grading score on immediate post operative day, 15 th , 30 th , 60 th , and 90 th post operative days were 3.161.2,2.11.2,1.66.2,1.52.3,and 1.33.1 respectively.This showed gradual reduction in lameness grading score.In group II (Titanium IILN), the mean lameness grading score on immediate post operative day, 15 th , 30 th , 60 th , and 90 th post operative days are 2.83.3,1.33.2,1.162.6,1.162.6 and 1.162.6respectively.In the group II dogs, earlier weight bearing and normal limb function were recorded with a mean of 3.52.5 days in compared to group I having a mean of 6.02.5 days, thus lameness grading was superior in titanium group.The fracture healing by negligible callus in 10 dogs, two dogs with secondary callus formation.Radiological scoring in the two groups showed complete radiographic healing from 60 th day to 90 th day post-operatively without any disturbance in apposition, alignment, angulation and apparatus. HIGHLIGHTSm Titanium and Stainless Steel Intramedullary Interlocking Nail were used for the repair of femur bone.m Showed complete radiographic healing on day 60 th to 90 th .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".