MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406854679 · doi:10.1200/po.24.00199

Clinical Activity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With MAP2K1 (MEK1)-Mutated Metastatic Cancers

2025· review· en· W4406854679 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Dankner, Emmanuelle Rousselle, Sarah Petrecca, François Fabi, Alexander Nowakowski, Anna-Maria Lazaratos, Charles Vincent Rajadurai, Andrew J. B. Stein, David Bian, Peter Tai, Alicia Belaiche, Meredith Li, Andrea Quaiattini, Nicola Normanno, Maria E. Arcila, Arielle Elkrief, Douglas B. Johnson, Marc Ladanyi, April A. N. Rose

Bibliographic record

VenueJCO Precision Oncology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMelanoma and MAPK Pathways
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersNational Cancer InstituteConquer Cancer Foundation
KeywordsMAPK/ERK pathwayMutantCancerMutationCancer researchMedicineKinaseProtein kinase AInternal medicineOncologyBiologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE MAP2K1/MEK1 mutations are potentially actionable drivers in cancer. MAP2K1 mutations have been functionally classified into three groups according to their dependency on upstream RAS/RAF signaling. However, the clinical efficacy of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibitors (MAPKi) for MAP2K1-mutant tumors is not well defined. We sought to characterize the genomic and clinical landscape of MAP2K1 mutant tumors to evaluate the relationship between MAP2K1 mutation class and clinical activity of MAPKi. METHODS We interrogated American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) GENIE (v13) to analyze solid tumors with MAP2K1 mutations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports of patients with MAP2K1-mutant cancers treated with MAPKi according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary end points were overall treatment response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival. RESULTS In the AACR GENIE data set, class 2 MAP2K1 mutations (63%) were more prevalent than class 1 (24%) and class 3 (13%) mutations ( P < .0001). Co-occurring MAPK pathway-activating mutations were more likely to occur in class 1 versus class 2 or 3 MAP2K1-mutant tumors ( P < .0001). Our systematic meta-analysis of the literature identified 46 patients with MAP2K1-mutant tumors who received MAPKi. In these patients, ORR was 28% and median PFS was 3.9 months. ORR did not differ according to MAP2K1 mutation class or cancer type. However, patients with class 2 mutations experienced longer PFS (5.0 months) and DOR (23.8 months) compared with patients with class 1, 3, or unclassified MAP2K1 mutations (PFS 3.5 months, P = .04; DOR 4.2 months, P = .02). CONCLUSION Patients with class 2 MAP2K1 mutations represent a novel subgroup that may derive benefit from MAPKi. Prospective clinical studies with novel MAPKi regimens are warranted in these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJCO Precision OncologySame topicMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysFrench-language works237,207