Reflections on the Timely Application of the Civil Law in the Heritage Matter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After 1989, in the context of Romania’s return to representative democracy, the transition to the market economy, the start of the Euro-Atlantic integration process and Romania’s accession to the European Union, an extensive resistematization of the legislative corpus was imposed, with the Civil Code finally being adopted, which under art. 220 para. (1) from Law no. 71/2011 for the implementation of Law no. 287/2009 regarding the Civil Code, published in the Official Monitor of Romania, Part I, no. 409 of June 10, 2011, entered into force on October 1, 2011. In essence, the Civil Code from 2009 ensures the inheritance in general and the unworthiness of the successor in particular, a modern, flexible and coherent regulation, at the same time capitalising on the solutions proposed in the civil codification projects from 1940 and 1971, as well as those from foreign codifications, with mainly from France, Italy and Québec. The entry into force of the Civil Code from 2009, however, has generated a difficult challenge for practitioners of the law regarding the method of time applications of the civil law on inheritance, with especially in terms of the opening of the inheritance, its transmission and devolution, the report successions can stretch even over decades. In this context, the present approach aims to provide a coherent interpretation regarding the civil law applicable to the legal acts or facts found in closely related to the relationship of succession law.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.044 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.020 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".