Organisation of child and adolescent mental health care
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. APPENDIX 1 6 -- 1.1. CHAPTER 1: DEFINITIONS 6 -- 2. APPENDIX 2 8 -- 2.1. CHAPTER 2: STEP 1 SEARCH STRATEGY 8 -- 2.1.1. OVID - MEDLINE 8 -- 2.1.2. Search Strategy EMBASE 11 -- 2.1.3. Search Strategy Psychinfo 14 -- 2.2. CHAPTER 2: STEP 2 SEARCH STRATEGY: GREY LITERATURE SEARCH 17 -- 2.3. CHAPTER 2: STEP 3 SEARCH STRATEGY 17 -- 2.3.1. Key-word search OVID MEDLINE 18 -- 2.3.2. Key-word search Embase 19 -- 2.3.3. Key-word search OVID PSYCHINFO 21 -- 2.4. CHAPTER 2: STEP 4 SEARCH STRATEGY 23 -- 2.5. CHAPTER 2: SELECTION COUNTRIES 32 -- 2.5.1. Long list of countries 32 -- 2.6. CHAPTER 2: EXPERTS OF SELECTED FOREIGN COUNTRIES 34 -- 2.7. CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK 34 -- 2.7.1. Methodological framework : analysing literature, grey literature and international experience. 34 -- 2.7.2. A1.Population 34 -- 2.7.3. A2.Stakeholders 34 -- 2.7.4. A3.Mental health care models, organizational models 35 -- 2.7.5. A4.Financial models (financing mechanisms, economical mechanisms) 35 -- 2.7.6. A5.Processes of Change 36 -- 2.7.7. B1.Efficacy 36 -- 2.7.8. B2. Applicability and adaptability 36 -- 3. APPENDIX 3 37 -- 3.1. CHAPTER 3: EVIDENCE TABLES 37 -- 3.1.1. Evidence tables: Systematic reviews 37 -- 3.1.2. Evidence tables: (Quasi-)experimental studies 41 -- 3.1.3. Evidence tables: Observational studies 67 -- 4. APPENDIX 4 72 -- 5. APPENDIX 5 BELGIUM 73 -- 5.1. BELGIUM: TABLES AND FIGURES 73 -- 5.2. BOTTOM-UP INITIATIVES AND GOOD PRACTICES 78 -- 5.2.1. Flanders 78 -- 5.2.2. Walloon region 78 -- 5.3. SOCIAL CARE AND YOUTH WELFARE IN THE GERMAN SPEAKING COMMUNITY 79 -- 5.4. DISABILITY CARE IN THE GERMAN SPEAKING COMMUNITY 79 -- 6. APPENDIX 6 THE NETHERLANDS 80 -- 6.1. GENERAL OVERVIEW 80 -- 6.1.1. Country profile 80 -- 6.2. TARGET POPULATION 80 -- 6.2.1. Age limits 80 -- 6.2.2. Epidemiologic data 80 -- 6.2.3. Defining target population and population needs 81 -- 6.3. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE ORGANIZATION 81 -- 6.4. HEALTH CARE: CAMH SERVICE ORGANIZATION & STAKEHOLDERS 82 -- 6.4.1. Camhs organization: services level 82 -- 6.4.2. Stakeholders: health services level 84 -- 6.5. HEALTH CARE: CAMH POLICIES AND POLICY STAKEHOLDERS 85 -- 6.5.1. Health care: Policy stakeholders 85 -- 6.5.2. Health care: camh policies 85 -- 6.6. OTHER SECTORS INVOLVED IN CHILDREN’S MENTAL HEALTH AND WELLBEING 87 -- 6.6.1. Social care: Youth care 89 -- 6.6.2. Juvenile justice 90 -- 6.6.3. Long term or disability care 91 -- 6.6.4. The Dutch Education system 92 -- 6.7. FINANCING AND FUNDING 93 -- 6.7.1. Financing of health care 93 -- 6.7.2. Financing of mental health care 94 -- 6.8. PROCESSES OF CHANGE 94 -- 6.9. EFFICACY 94 -- 6.9.1. Knowledge centres 94 -- 6.9.2. Needs assessment and outcome measurement 95 -- 6.10. THE NETHERLANDS: ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 96 -- 6.10.1. Target population 96 -- 7. APPENDIX 7 CANADA 99 -- 7.1. GENERAL OVERVIEW 99 -- 7.1.1. Country profile 99 -- 7.1.2. Health care system 100 -- 7.2. HEALTH CARE: CAMH SERVICE ORGANIZATION & STAKEHOLDERS 101 -- 7.2.1. Camhs organization: services level 101 -- 7.2.2. Stakeholders: health services level 104 -- 7.3. HEALTH CARE: CAMHS POLICY AND POLICY STAKEHOLDERS 104 -- 7.3.1. Health care: Policy stakeholders 104 -- 7.3.2. Health care: Child and Adolescent Mental Health Policies & Plans 105 -- 7.4. OTHER SECTORS INVOLVED IN CHILDREN’S (MENTAL) HEALTH AND WELLBEING 106 -- 7.4.1. Juvenile Justice 106 -- 7.4.2. Child Welfare 107 -- 7.4.3. Disabled persons 107 -- 7.4.4. Education 108 -- 7.5. FINANCING AND FUNDING OF CAMHS 109 -- 7.5.1. Financing models 109 -- 7.5.2. British Columbia: financing of child and adolescent mental health care services. 109 -- 7.6. EFFICACY 110 -- 8. APPENDIX 8 ENGLAND 110 -- 8.1. GENERAL OVERVIEW 110 -- 8.1.1. Country profile 110 -- 8.1.2. Preliminary remark 110 -- 8.1.3. Health care organization 111 -- 8.2. TARGET POPULATION 113 -- 8.2.1. Age limits 113 -- 8.2.2. Epidemiologic data 113 -- 8.3. HEALTH CARE: CAMH SERVICE ORGANIZATION & STAKEHOLDERS 113 -- 8.3.1. Camhs organization: services level 113 -- 8.3.2. Stakeholders: health services level 116 -- 8.4. HEALTH CARE: CAMH POLICIES AND POLICY STAKEHOLDERS 117 -- 8.4.1. Health care: policy stakeholders 117 -- 8.5. OTHER SECTORS INVOLVED IN CHILDREN’S MENTAL HEALTH AND WELLBEING 121 -- 8.5.1. Social care: Youth care 121 -- 8.5.2. Juvenile justice 123 -- 8.5.3. Disability care 124 -- 8.5.4. Education system 125 -- 8.6. FINANCING AND FUNDING 127 -- 8.6.1. Financing models 127 -- 8.6.2. Financing of health care 127 -- 8.6.3. Financing of child and adolescent mental health care 127 -- 8.6.4. Recent developments 127 -- 8.7. PROCESSES OF CHANGE 128 -- 8.7.1. Motivation underlying change 128 -- 8.7.2. Evaluation of process of change: an independent review 128 -- 8.8. EFFICACY 128 -- 8.8.1. Evaluation and monitoring 128 -- 8.8.2. Efficacy of planning and camhs development from a child centred and family driven point of -- view: CAPA 130 -- 8.8.3. Knowledge centres 130 -- 8.9. ENGLAND: ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 131 -- 9. REFERENCES 137
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.281 | 0.123 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".