Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries for Electric Vehicles: Critical Single Cell Level Assessment of Capacity and Lithium Necessity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In pursuing advanced clean energy storage technologies, all-solid-state Li metal batteries (ASSMBs) emerge as promising alternatives to conventional organic liquid electrolyte-based batteries due to their reduced flammability risks, increased energy densities, extended lifespan, and design flexibility. Here, we estimate lithium requirements per unit of energy, cathode loading, and the amount of electrolyte required at a single-layer cell level ASSMB utilizing garnet-type, NASICON-type, and sulfide solid electrolytes and LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811), LiCoO 2, and LiFePO 4 cathodes for Li metal anode and in situ anode configurations. To enable advanced batteries suitable for long-range and fast-charging electric vehicles, the electrodes (anode and cathode) must achieve a practical areal capacity of at least 7 mAh cm –2 and support rapid charging rates of 4C (15 min). Furthermore, we also present the key requirements for mechanical properties and strategic design considerations in ASSMB architecture to effectively address the challenges posed by the volume expansion of the electrodes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".