MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effect of changes in body composition and sociodemographic factors on colon cancer survival.

2025· article· en· W4406869652 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ignacio Catala Vilaplana, Gillian V. H. Smith, Hannah K. Schulte, Howard J. Lim, Gillian E. Hanley, Kristin L. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineColorectal cancerCancerCancer survivalInternal medicineOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

296 Background: Muscle mass, muscle quality, and adipose tissue volumes have been shown to affect colon cancer survival. Further research is required to understand how change in body composition during treatment impacts colon cancer outcomes, and how covariables such mental health and socioeconomic status affect this relationship. The aim of this project was to examine how changes in body composition during chemotherapy for colon cancer impact the duration of disease-free survival (DFS) and how sociodemographic covariables (age, sex, social isolation, depression, anxiety, income, community size) influence this relationship. Methods: Computed tomography (CT) scans from the time of diagnosis and the end of chemotherapy were obtained from individuals treated for stage III colon cancer with oxaliplatin at BC Cancer between 2012 and 2016. Whole body tissue volumes were estimated based on CT images at the level of the third lumbar vertebra, analysed using DAFS Express (Voronoi Health Analytics Inc., Vancouver BC). Muscle quantity was measured as skeletal muscle index (SMI), and muscle quality was measured as skeletal muscle density (SMD) and skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). Quantity of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), and total adipose tissue (TAT) were also measured. Social isolation, anxiety, and depression symptoms were measured using the validated Psychosocial Screen for Cancer–Revised. Neighbourhood income and community population were estimated using postal codes. Cox proportional hazard models were calculated for the effect of body composition variables on DFS, and interactions with sociodemographic variables. Results: Significant reductions in SMI, SMD, SMG, VAT, IMAT and TAT were observed between diagnosis and post-chemotherapy (n=282). Improved survival was associated with higher SMD and lower IMAT at diagnosis and post-chemotherapy, lower VAT at diagnosis, and an increase in VAT or TAT during chemotherapy. Body composition had a more significant effect on survival in individuals who were older, female, or lived in smaller communities. Conclusions: Significant reductions in SMI, SMD, SMG, VAT, IMAT and TAT were observed between diagnosis and post-chemotherapy (n=282). Improved survival was associated with higher SMD and lower IMAT at diagnosis and post-chemotherapy, lower VAT at diagnosis, and an increase in VAT or TAT during chemotherapy. Body composition had a more significant effect on survival in individuals who were older, female, or lived in smaller communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.560
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicNutrition and Health in Aging→French-language works237,207→