Phase Ib study of gevokizumab (GEVO) in combination with standard-of-care (SoC) anticancer therapies in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (mGEC), and metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
135 Background: GEVO, a humanized monoclonal antibody, binds to interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and inhibits its activity. We report results from a phase Ib study of GEVO + SoC anticancer therapies in pts with mCRC/mGEC/mRCC. Methods: This open-label study enrolled pts aged ≥18 years in cohorts A (first line mCRC, [A]), B (second line [2L] mCRC, [B]), C (2L mGEC, [C]) and D (2L/third line mRCC, [D]). The primary objectives were to determine the pharmacodynamically-active dose (PAD) of GEVO monotherapy in A/B, the safety and tolerability, and the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of GEVO + SoC in A/B/C/D, and the efficacy of GEVO + SoC at RDE in A/B/C measured by the progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The proof of concept (PoC) criteria for PFS rates were ≥42% at 15 months (m) (lower 80% CI limit ≥29%) in A, ≥48% at ~9 m (lower 80% CI limit ≥37%) in B, ≥51% at 6 m (lower 60% CI limit ≥38%) in C. The relationship between baseline levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-1β, and on-treatment decrease of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels with clinical response was explored. Results: As of March 1, 2023, 71 (A), 62 (B), 26 (C) and 7 pts (D) were treated. The PAD was established as 120 mg GEVO intravenous (IV) every 4 weeks (Q4W) and the RDE as 120 mg GEVO IV Q4W + SoC. There were 2 dose-limiting toxicities: grade 4 decreased neutrophil count (1 pt in C) and grade 3 hyponatremia (1 pt in D). The most frequent grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (≥15% of all pts) were neutropenia (A/B: 21.1%/22.6%), decreased neutrophil count (A/B/C: 18.3%/17.7%/15.4%) and hyponatremia (D: 28.6%). The PFS rates were 29.0% (80% CI: 20.4, 38.2), 39.4% (80% CI: 29.8, 48.9), 20.0% (60% CI: 13.3, 27.6) in A/B/C, respectively. In B, median PFS and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in pts with baseline hs-CRP <10 mg/L (low [L]) than ≥10 mg/L (high [H]), IL-6 <9.58 pg/mL (L) than ≥9.58 pg/mL (H), and IL-1β <0.12 pg/mL (L) than ≥0.12 pg/mL (H). In A + B, a median on-treatment decrease of ctDNA fraction by >72% (H) was associated with significantly longer OS. Conclusions: The safety and tolerability of GEVO combinations was acceptable. The primary PFS rates did not meet the PoC criteria. Baseline levels of hs-CRP, IL-6 and IL-1β in pts with 2L mCRC, and on-treatment reduction of ctDNA in pts with 1L + 2L mCRC may have prognostic value. Clinical trial information: NCT03798626 . Variables PFS HR (95% CI) p-value OS HR (95% CI) p-value Ahs-CRP L / HIL-6 L / HIL-1β L / H 1.74 (0.81, 3.73)1.38 (0.70, 2.72)1.50 (0.74, 3.01) 0.1550.3520.259 1.99 (0.66, 5.98)1.73 (0.71, 4.20)0.98 (0.38, 2.52) 0.2210.2250.973 Bhs-CRP L / HIL-6 L / HIL-1β L / H 2.56 (1.27, 5.18)2.92 (1.33, 6.40)2.41 (1.13, 5.13) 0.0090.0070.022 3.04 (1.40, 6.60)3.25 (1.43, 7.36)3.60 (1.54, 8.44) 0.0050.0050.003 A + BctDNA decrease L / H 0.65 (0.39, 1.10) 0.108 0.45 (0.24, 0.83) 0.011
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".