MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characterization of the real-world first line (1L) use of single dose tremelimumab regular interval durvalumab (STRIDE), for treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), using two electronic medical record (EMR) databases.

2025· article· en· W4406870066 on OpenAlexaff
Aparna Chauhan, Mufiza Farid‐Kapadia, Stephen J. Valerio, Neel Vaidya

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Canadian institutionsAstraZeneca (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTremelimumabMedicineDurvalumabHepatocellular carcinomaInternal medicineDatabaseOncologyCancerImmunotherapyNivolumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

534 Background: In October 2022, the US FDA approved the STRIDE (Single Dose Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) regimen, comprising tremelimumab 300 mg for 1 dose plus durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks, for the 1L treatment of uHCC in adults aged ≥18 years. Thus far there is limited data characterizing STRIDE's 1L use in the real world. This observational study aims to describe patient characteristics, and clinical profiles of a 1L STRIDE cohort. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using EMR data from two community oncology practice networks, Florida Cancer Specialists and American Oncology Network, from January 1, 2018, to March 31, 2024. Adults with HCC who received ≥1 administration of the STRIDE regimen as 1L treatment following diagnosis were included. Patients with evidence of other cancers or systemic therapies pre-index date were excluded, to establish a cancer-naïve cohort at index. Index date was first administration of STRIDE. The analysis described the patient characteristics and clinical profile at index date. Patient demographics, severity indicators (cancer stage, albumin-bilirubin index (ALBI), alpha fetoprotein (AFP), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)) and lab data were assessed on or closest to index date. Results: 79 patients initiated the 1L STRIDE regimen. The median (P25, P75) age at index was 70 (63.2-76.4) years. 72.2% were males, 64.6% were white, and 69.6% were overweight or obese patients. 95% had their first HCC diagnosis between 2022-2024 and the mean time from diagnosis to index date was 3.8 months (SD: 10.2). Among patients with reported cancer stage (n=57), most (82.5%, n=47) were diagnosed with stages IIIA to IVB. 18% had ECOG scores ≥2. 86% had ALBI grades between 2-3; 42.1% had AFP level ≥400 ng/ml; 30.4% had cirrhosis (among those that reported comorbidities) and 24.1% received any loco-regional therapy. Conclusions: Our study provides a real-world profile of patients on 1L STRIDE. Compared to the HIMALAYA trial, these findings suggest that patients in this real-world study tend to be older, diagnosed at late-stage, have a poor liver profile, and potentially worse prognosis over time. Further research is required to explore treatment pathways after index date, over a long follow-up, which may provide more insight into the continuity and effectiveness of IL STRIDE in the real-world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.271
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicMathematical Biology Tumor GrowthFrench-language works237,207