The Challenge of Developing a Test to Differentiate Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae Serotypes 9 and 11
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae is a major swine pathogen, classified into 19 serotypes based on capsular polysaccharide (CPS) loci. This study aimed to improve the diagnostic method to differentiate between serotypes 9 and 11, which are challenging to distinguish using conventional serological and molecular methods. A novel qPCR assay based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes was developed and validated using a collection of reference strains representing all known 19 serotypes. The assay demonstrated specificity in detecting the nucleotide variation characteristic of the serotype 9 reference strain. However, the analysis of a clinical isolate collection identified discrepancies between LNA-qPCR and serological results, prompting further investigation of the cps and O-Ag loci. Subsequent nanopore sequencing and whole-genome sequencing of a collection of 31 European clinical isolates, previously identified as serotype 9, 11, or undifferentiated 9/11, revealed significant genetic variations in the cps and O-Ag loci. Ten isolates had a cpsF sequence identical to that of the serotype 11 reference strain, while six isolates had single-nucleotide polymorphisms that were unlikely to cause significant coding changes. In contrast, 15 isolates had interruptions in the cpsF gene, distinct from that found in the serotype 9 reference strain, potentially leading to a serotype 9 CPS structure. In the O-Ag loci, differences between serotypes 9 and 11 were minimal, although some isolates had mutations potentially affecting O-Ag expression. Overall, these findings suggest that multiple genetic events can lead to the formation of a serotype 9 CPS structure, hindering the development of a single qPCR assay capable of detecting all cpsF gene mutations. Our results suggest that, currently, a comprehensive analysis of the cpsF gene is necessary to accurately determine whether the capsule of an isolate corresponds to serotype 9 or 11. Although such analyses are feasible with the advent of third-generation sequencing technologies, their accessibility, cost, and time to result limit their use in routine diagnostic applications. Under these circumstances, the designation of the hybrid serovar 9/11 remains a valid approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".