The Administration of Heritage Language Schools in Multicultural Societies: The Case of the Hellenic School of Ottawa, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many ethnic communities living in multicultural societies have established Heritage Language Schools (HLS) to transmit ethnic language and preserve ethnic culture. The administration of these HLS is no easy task however (Arvanitis, 2004; Pu, 2012; Tamis, 2010). Research is needed to help better understand how HLS programs, such as the Hellenic School of Ottawa (HSO), are administered and what can help enhance administration practices and the sustainment of these schools (Zoupa & Karlis, 2015). The purpose of this paper is to examine the perceptions of administration towards the administrative practices of the HSO. Specifically, the objectives of this study are to present the perceptions of HCO administrators toward: (1) the structure and objectives of the HSO, (2) the strengths and weaknesses of the administration of the HSO, and (3) suggestions for the enhancement of the administration of the HSO. Semi-structured interviews were conducted on ten former administrators of the HSO who have been responsible for operation of the HSO. It was found that the structure of the HSO focused on the instruction of the Greek language, including the four language skills- listening, speaking, reading, and writing; whereas, the objectives of the HSO focused on instilling a love for the Greek language. Moreover, administrators presented two strengths of the administration of HSO - (1) support from the HCO, and (2) people involvement as well as three weaknesses - (1) support from the HCO, and (2) people involvement. Further, the administrators presented ten suggestions for the enhancement of the operation of the HSO - (1) teachers of higher qualifications, (2) addition of more Greek-content activities, (3) time-frame expansion, (4) resources, (5) teacher support, (6) summer camps in Greece, (7) create school partnerships, (8) Webinars and seminars, (9) trips to Greece, and (10) engagement in Greek-content activities. Keywords: heritage language schools, Hellenic School of Ottawa, administration, ethnic language, ethnic culture
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.057 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".