MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406874612 · doi:10.3390/jmse13020224

Sea Clutter Suppression Method Based on Ocean Dynamics Using the WRF Model

2025· article· en· W4406874612 on OpenAlexaff
Guigeng Li, Zhaoqiang Wei, Yujie Chen, Xiaoxia Meng, Hao Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Marine Science and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicShip Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsWeather Research and Forecasting ModelClutterEnvironmental scienceOcean dynamicsRemote sensingMeteorologyClimatologyOceanographyGeologyOcean currentGeographyComputer scienceRadar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sea clutter introduces a significant amount of non-target reflections in the echo signals received by radar, complicating target detection and identification. To address the challenge of existing filter parameters being unable to adapt in real-time to the characteristics of sea clutter, this paper integrates ocean numerical models into the sea clutter spectrum estimation. By adjusting filter parameters based on the spectral characteristics of sea clutter, the accurate suppression of sea clutter is achieved. In this paper, the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model is employed to simulate the ocean dynamic parameters within the radar detection area. Hydrological data are utilized to calibrate the parameterization scheme of the WRF model. Based on the simulated ocean dynamic parameters, empirical formulas are used to calculate the sea clutter spectrum. The filter coefficients are updated in real-time using the sea clutter spectral parameters, enabling precise suppression of sea clutter. The suppression algorithm is validated using X-band radar-measured sea clutter data, demonstrating an improvement factor of 17.22 after sea clutter suppression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Marine Science and EngineeringSame topicShip Hydrodynamics and ManeuverabilityFrench-language works237,207