The World Systems and Past Events According to The Analyses of Buddhism Literatures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are different views about the world, the universe and past history. This article will focus on the theories according to the Buddhism literatures. There are three major approaches to study the ancient history of human civilization: 1. History-related Record; 2. On-site Discovery; 3. Supernatural Exploration. The supernatural exploration is usually only accessible to top elites, and often carried out secretly by higher officials, because most public civilians are not able to believe that. For example, CIA has explored the ancient Mars by a person who has supernatural abilities [1]. That person is able to visualize Mars and see what happened a million years ago. The project’s name is Mars Exploration, an exploration by supernatural abil-ity. The result is in line with the later-on scientific discovery that the Mars could have pre-historical civilization which was wiped out by N explosions [2,3]. In this case, the super-natural ability is used not only for study the ancient events but also for exploring the universe. Regarding supernatural abilities, there are different levels. Who have the most powerful su-pernatural powers? Apparently, the ancient religious leaders that built up a long-lasting reli-gion have the most powerful supernatural abilities than others. Thus, it is an innovative and resourceful approach to study the human civilization and even some earth events from the re-ligious books authored by ancient saints. Buddhism Sutra is the record for the teachings of Buddha, who told the stories according to his observation. There are a number of Buddha’s observations about pre-historical events as well as the world systems (universe) as document-ed in Buddhism sutra; such pre-historical events and world-component theories are believed to be true according to the exploration of Buddha through his supernatural ability. This article will study the past history and the world models via critical analyses of Buddhism literatures, especially these sutras.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".