MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406883343 · doi:10.5348/100084z11ar2025cr

Epithelioid hemangioma of the skull: Rare case report

2025· article· en· W4406883343 on OpenAlexaff
Chanpreet K. Riarh, Lauren Tristani, Raveena Ramphal, Joseph de Nanassy, Nagwa Wilson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioWestern UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkullHemangiomaMedicineAnatomyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Epithelioid hemangiomas (EH) are benign vascular tumors that commonly occur in the skin, subcutis, and bone—most typically arising as nodules in the neck and head region. Pediatric cases with atypical presentations remain rare and challenging. Case Report: The following outlines the case of a 2-year-old male who presented with a bump and swelling on the left side of his head. Imaging tests identified multiple, hyperdense, and focally ring-enhancing intra-axial lesions located mainly at the gray-white matter junction of bilateral frontal left-sided parietal, left-sided occipital, and left-sided temporal lobes. In addition, multiple lytic lesions were seen in the calvarium. Pathology confirmed EH. While one lesion required surgical resection, the remaining lesions showed spontaneous regression during follow-up. Conclusion: This case highlights the diagnostic and management challenges associated with pediatric EH involving the head, including intracranial involvement. The patient’s unique presentation, age, and lesion involution expand the understanding of EH beyond its typical manifestation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVascular Tumors and AngiosarcomasFrench-language works237,207