Deep Learning–Powered CT-Less Multitracer Organ Segmentation From PET Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The common approach for organ segmentation in hybrid imaging relies on coregistered CT (CTAC) images. This method, however, presents several limitations in real clinical workflows where mismatch between PET and CT images are very common. Moreover, low-dose CTAC images have poor quality, thus challenging the segmentation task. Recent advances in CT-less PET imaging further highlight the necessity for an effective PET organ segmentation pipeline that does not rely on CT images. Therefore, the goal of this study was to develop a CT-less multitracer PET segmentation framework. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected 2062 PET/CT images from multiple scanners. The patients were injected with either 18 F-FDG (1487) or 68 Ga-PSMA (575). PET/CT images with any kind of mismatch between PET and CT images were detected through visual assessment and excluded from our study. Multiple organs were delineated on CT components using previously trained in-house developed nnU-Net models. The segmentation masks were resampled to coregistered PET images and used to train 4 different deep learning models using different images as input, including noncorrected PET (PET-NC) and attenuation and scatter-corrected PET (PET-ASC) for 18 F-FDG (tasks 1 and 2, respectively using 22 organs) and PET-NC and PET-ASC for 68 Ga tracers (tasks 3 and 4, respectively, using 15 organs). The models' performance was evaluated in terms of Dice coefficient, Jaccard index, and segment volume difference. RESULTS: The average Dice coefficient over all organs was 0.81 ± 0.15, 0.82 ± 0.14, 0.77 ± 0.17, and 0.79 ± 0.16 for tasks 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. PET-ASC models outperformed PET-NC models ( P < 0.05) for most of organs. The highest Dice values were achieved for the brain (0.93 to 0.96 in all 4 tasks), whereas the lowest values were achieved for small organs, such as the adrenal glands. The trained models showed robust performance on dynamic noisy images as well. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning models allow high-performance multiorgan segmentation for 2 popular PET tracers without the use of CT information. These models may tackle the limitations of using CT segmentation in PET/CT image quantification, kinetic modeling, radiomics analysis, dosimetry, or any other tasks that require organ segmentation masks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".