Carboxy-Amidated AamAP1-Lys has Superior Conformational Flexibility and Accelerated Killing of Gram-Negative Bacteria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide C-terminal amidation of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) is a frequent minor modification used to improve antibacterial potency, commonly ascribed to increased positive charge, protection from proteases, and a stabilized secondary structure. Although the activity of AMPs is primarily associated with the ability to penetrate bacterial membranes, hitherto the effect of amidation on this interaction has not been understood in detail. Here, we show that amidation of the scorpion-derived membranolytic peptide AamAP1-Lys produces a potent analog with faster bactericidal activity, increased membrane permeabilization, and greater Gram-negative membrane penetration associated with greater conformational flexibility. AamAP1-lys-NH 2 has improved antibiofilm activity against Acinetobacter baumannii and Escherichia coli, benefits from a two- to 3-fold selectivity improvement, and provides protection against A. baumannii infection in a Galleria mellonella burn wound model. Circular dichroism spectroscopy shows both peptides adopt α-helix conformations in the steady state. However, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations reveal that, during initial binding, AamAP1-Lys-NH 2 has greater conformation heterogeneity, with substantial polyproline-II conformation detected alongside α-helix, and penetrates the bilayer more readily than AamAP1-Lys. AamAP1-Lys-NH 2 induced membrane permeabilization of A. baumannii occurs only above a critical concentration with slow and weak permeabilization and slow killing occurring at its lower MIC but causes greater and faster permeabilization than AamAP1-Lys, and kills more rapidly, when applied at equal concentrations. Therefore, while the increased potency of AamAP1-Lys-NH 2 is associated with slow bactericidal killing, amidation, and the conformational flexibility it induces, affords an improvement in the AMP pharmacodynamic profile and may need to be considered to achieve improved therapeutic performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".