Internal/External Bacterial Sources of Subgingival Plaque Reconstitution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objectives The objectives were to quantify the contributions of internal (self) and external (familial) sources to the recolonization of the bacterial content of the subgingival plaque following professional prophylaxis and assess the effect of close-contact activities on modifying this contribution. Materials and Methods Families, each consisting of at least one preschool-aged child and at least one sibling, were recruited for this interventional cohort pilot study. Microbial samples were collected from various oral sites, including saliva, buccal mucosa, tongue, supragingival plaque, and subgingival plaque in all family members. Following the child’s oral prophylaxis, subgingival plaque samples were collected one week later. DNA from these samples was extracted and sequenced using the 16S rRNA gene and estimation of the sources were quantified using Bayesian source tracking models. Additional analyses using generalized linear mixed models, Phylofactorization, and Spearman correlations. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results Child’s own subgingival plaque was the primary source of recolonization, contributing 63.7% to the microbial community one-week post-prophylaxis. Siblings contributed approximately 8%, a contribution significantly higher than that from parents, who contributed around 3% each (p<0.05). The analysis revealed a statistically significant positive correlation between the number of siblings and their bacterial contribution to the child’s subgingival plaque. Several close contact activities between parents and children were statistically associated with higher contribution (p<0.05, Spearman correlation). Additionally, 110 bacteria were statistically significantly different in their internal contribution compared to external, after accounting for household association, sample type, and family members (p<0.05, Phylofactor) Conclusion The findings challenge the traditional focus on parent-child transmission of oral microbes, highlighting the importance of studying families as a whole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".