MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Reconfigurable Current-Mode Antialiasing Filter for Low-Frequency Industrial Applications

2024· article· en· W4406894777 on OpenAlexaff
Timothee Trembly, Justin Pabot, Yvon Savaria, Ahmad Hassan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)Filter (signal processing)Mode (computer interface)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a current-mode antialiasing filter (AAF) based on second-generation current-controlled current conveyors (CCCII). It is specifically aimed at kHz-range industrial applications. The filter comprises two CCCIIs and two triple-MIM (Metal-Insulator-Metal) grounded capacitors. An OpAmp-based voltage-controlled current source handles the bias current control. The cutoff frequency of the proposed second-order AAF can be continuously tuned by exploiting the inversely proportional relationship between the parasitic impedance at the input X-terminal of the CCCII and its DC bias current, without relying on any additional circuitry. The performance of the proposed design has been validated through post-layout and corner SPECTRE simulations using a 0.18 <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mu \mathrm{m}$</tex> HV CMOS SOI process. The <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$-3\ \mathrm{d}\mathrm{P}$</tex> cutoff frequency can be continuously tuned between 3.9 kHz and 34.9 kHz. A passband gain error of 1.127 % is reported, along with a Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) of 3.96 % for a 20 <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mu \mathrm{A}$</tex> peak-to-peak, 5 kHz sine wave input. The solution requires 0.67 <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$mm^{2}$</tex> core area when leveraging triple-Mimcapacitors offered in the process. The proposed architecture achieves a control accuracy of 0.32 % with respect to the associated theoretical model, and 0.951 decades of tuning range. It consumes 3.52 mW under a supply voltage of 5 V.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207