MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406902722 · doi:10.1039/d4an01212g

Enzyme-free temperature resilient amplification assay with toehold stem-loop probe

2025· article· en· W4406902722 on OpenAlexafffund
Jay Bhakti Kapadia, Jamal Daoud, Jonathan Perreault

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsArmand Frappier MuseumDawson CollegeInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersMitacs
KeywordsLoop (graph theory)ChemistryBiophysicsBiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Toehold mediated strand displacement reaction (TMSDR) offers a rapid, enzyme-free amplification strategy, providing advantages over traditional methods like RT-PCR, and RT-LAMP. Optimizing TMSDR can significantly enhance sensitivity in point-of-care biosensor applications for target nucleic acid detection. However, achieving optimal performance requires meticulous probe design and stringent quality control. We developed a TMSDR-based system targeting a specific SARS-CoV-2 RNA sequence through testing multiple fluorophore-quencher labeled DNA probes. Following optimization, a probe with a strategically designed: stem, loop, and optimized toehold length emerged as the most effective candidate. Displacer sequence optimization further enhanced amplification efficiency. Ensuring probe purity is crucial, as impurities elevated background noise and diminished sensitivity. This work underscores the importance of rigorous probe quality in achieving reliable and sensitive TMSDR-based viral RNA detection, paving the way for robust point-of-care diagnostic tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AnalystSame topicMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207