MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406913111 · doi:10.1016/j.amp.2024.12.003

Impact d’une formation francophone, internationale et en ligne sur le trouble de la personnalité

2025· article· fr· W4406913111 on OpenAlexafffund
Lionel Cailhol, Simon Poirier, Paco Prada, Jônio F. Salles, Sophie Slovak, Antoine Yrondi

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatrique · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services SociauxArius3D (Canada)
FundersUniversité de Montréal
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alors que la prévalence du Trouble de la Personnalité Limite (TPL) est élevée et qu’il est caractérisé par une importante sévérité, les personnes atteintes rencontrent souvent des obstacles à l’accès à des soins efficaces en raison de la stigmatisation dans les services de santé. Les formations sur le sujet jouent un rôle crucial pour améliorer la compétence des intervenants et changer leur regard sur les personnes vivant avec le TPL. Dans ce contexte, une équipe de professeurs a développé une formation en ligne autonome intégrant des témoignages de patients partenaires. Évaluer la satisfaction des participants à cette formation, ainsi que l’impact sur différents domaines (perception et compréhension du TPL, impact sur leur pratique). Étude transversale utilisant deux sondages auprès de l’ensemble des étudiants inscrits à un cours en ligne de janvier à septembre 2023. Outre une description des résultats des deux échantillons, nous avons réalisé une approche qualitative des réponses des participants aux questions ouvertes. En plus d’une importante satisfaction, nous avons retrouvé une augmentation du confort des apprenants avec les patients vivant avec un TPL après avoir suivi le cours en ligne. Les réponses qualitatives ont mis en évidence l’intégration de nouvelles approches thérapeutiques, une meilleure compréhension du TPL, une confiance accrue dans la prise en charge des patients, des changements concrets dans la pratique clinique, ainsi qu’une amélioration de la gestion des émotions. Les participants au cours ont intégré plusieurs compétences, et la formation aurait amélioré la perception des personnes vivant avec un TPL chez les cliniciens, renforçant la compréhension, réduisant les préjugés, et favorisant une meilleure gestion émotionnelle. L’étude s’inscrit dans la littérature sur la pédagogie médicale en ligne. Bien qu’efficaces, elles doivent être considérées comme des stratégies complémentaires aux approches en présence. While the prevalence of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is high and it is characterized by significant severity, individuals affected often encounter obstacles to accessing effective care due to stigma in healthcare services. Training on the subject plays a crucial role in improving the competence of caregivers and changing their perception of individuals living with BPD. In this context, a team of professors developed an autonomous online training integrating testimonials from patient partners. To evaluate the satisfaction of participants in this training, as well as its impact on various domains (perception and understanding of BPD, impact on their practice). A cross-sectional study was conducted using two surveys among all students enrolled in an online course from January to September 2023. The first survey, conducted after the course, was gradually administered before the allocation of training credits, while the second, anonymous survey was distributed via the student forum, accessible to all enrolled students in September 2023, regardless of their stage of course completion. Sample 1, consisting of 32 respondents predominantly female (F/H ratio = 3.3), mainly comprised physicians (42.8%) working in a hospital setting (39.0%) and frequently exposed to individuals living with BPD. Sample 2, with 44 respondents, mainly included participants who had partially completed the course (61.4%) and had not participated in synchronous sessions (70.4%), with no data on socio-demographic characteristics. Sample 1, mainly composed of physicians working in hospital settings and frequently exposed to patients with BPD, reported an increase in their comfort with these patients after completing the online course, with high satisfaction both for the online format and the course length. Qualitative responses highlighted the integration of new therapeutic approaches, a better understanding of BPD, increased confidence in patient care, concrete changes in clinical practice, as well as improved emotional management and counter transference. Improvement suggestions included more in-depth content on comorbidities and therapies, aspects related to professional practice and external management, as well as particular attention to prevention and pharmacology. As for Sample 2, respondents’ satisfaction was high, emphasizing the expertise of the trainers, the variety of educational materials, the relevance and updating of the content, as well as the flexibility and accessibility of the course. Areas for improvement included lack of diversity of viewpoints, length and density of content, lack of associated resources and the ability to download course materials, as well as issues with audiovisual quality and use of sophisticated terms. Participants have integrated several skills, and the training appears to have improved clinicians’ perception of individuals living with BPD, enhancing understanding, reducing biases and resistance, and promoting better emotional management. While the strengths of the training have been identified, improvements are needed, including greater diversity of perspectives and more effective management of content length and density. The study aligns with the literature on online medical education. Although online training can be effective, it should not completely replace traditional training and should be viewed as supplementary strategies. The study results are limited by a low response rate, but suggest that online training on BPD is feasible and effective, with implications for enhancing future courses and the need for further research to assess its impact on participants’ knowledge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatriqueSame topicPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyFrench-language works237,207