MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406920646 · doi:10.1177/15910199251315790

Is there a simple and accessible solution to improve acute infarct core imaging? The utility of steady-state CT angiographic source images obtained from a delayed phase acquisition

2025· article· en· W4406920646 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alex Mortimer, Richard Flood, Sophie Dunkerton, Sarah E. McClelland, David Minks, Robert Crossley, James Wareham, Aubrey Smith, Anthony Cox, Rose Bosnell

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventional Neuroradiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiologyThrombolysisAngiographyPerfusion scanningStroke (engine)Confidence intervalPerfusionMiddle cerebral arteryAcute strokeNuclear medicineMyocardial infarctionIschemiaCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Early identification and quantification of core infarct is of importance in stroke management for treatment selection, prognostication, and complication prediction. Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) (NCCT) remains the primary tool, but it suffers from limited sensitivity and inter-rater variability; CT perfusion is inconsistently available and commonly blighted by movement artefact. We assessed the performance of a standardised form of CT angiographic source imaging (CTASI) obtained through addition of a delayed phase at 40 seconds post-contrast injection (DP40) following fast-acquisition CT angiography. METHODS: Contrast resolution between ischaemic and normal grey matter (GM) was compared qualitatively and quantitatively to NCCT. Using Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), DP40 low density was compared to NCCT and venous phase CT perfusion source images (CTPSI) and to 24-hour NCCT ASPECTS in patients with timely endovascular recanalisation (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction 2C/3). RESULTS: Seventy-four patients with a proximal middle cerebral artery or terminal internal carotid artery occlusion were included. The mean attenuation difference between ischaemic and normal GM increased from 4.86+/-3.12 HU (NCCT) to 9.30+/-3.14 HU (DP40) (p < 0.0001). Subjective assessment by two raters revealed that DP40 improved ischaemic tissue conspicuity in 39 to 41 (78-82%) of cases (kappa 0.805, standard error 0.108, 95% confidence interval: 0.593-1.000). The correlation between ASPECTS on baseline imaging and eventual 24-hour ASPECTS improved from R = 0.7197 for NCCT to R = 0.9875 for DP40 (z = 7.89, p < 0.0001). The correlation between DP40 and venous phase CTPSI ASPECTS was 0.9681, p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: DP40 CTASI represent a simple technique for improving detection and estimation of extent of ischaemia over NCCT and show close correlation with surrogate measures of infarct core.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventional NeuroradiologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207