MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406923487 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2514

P-2363. Efficacy Of SARS–CoV-2 Specific Antiviral Therapy for Enteroviral Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ChronicFatigue Syndrome

2025· article· en· W4406923487 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Immunology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEncephalomyelitisSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Virology2019-20 coronavirus outbreakPicornavirusImmunologyRescue therapyInternal medicineMultiple sclerosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Etiology remains elusive for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), and no treatment exists. Antivirals had no efficacy in randomized clinical trials (RCT) for Epstein-Barr Virus and HHV-6. Enteroviruses (EV) have been implicated, but no antivirals are available. Many patients who received SARS–CoV-2-specific antiviral drugs for acute Covid-19 (COV19) infection experienced significant improvement of prior ME/CFS symptoms. This study summarizes their responses to antivirals for SARS-Cov-2. Methods Neutralizing Antibody (NA) for Coxsackievirus B (CVB)1-6 and Echovirus 6, 7, 9, 11, 30 were done by ARUP lab. Enterovirus Protein (EVP) of Peripheral Blood Leukocytes (PBL) was determined by Western Blot. ME/CFS patients fulfilled Canadian consensus criteria, and had either elevated NA for enteroviruses and/or positive EVP in PBL. ME/CFS patients hospitalized for acute COV19 infection and patients without COV19, were given 5-10 days of IV Remdesivir (Rem) +/- immune modulators. Controls: 20 ME/CFS patients seen concurrently without Remdesivir treatment. Other ME/CFS patients (non-COV19) were given Nirmaltrelvir/Ritonavir (PAX) daily for 10 days +/- one repeat. The energy index (EI) was monitored by the patients before, during and after treatment. Significant improvement was defined as > 30%. Results 15/20 (75%) ME/CFS patients – 10/12 hospitalized, 5/8 non-COV19 patients – responded to IV Rem 2-6 weeks after infusions; remission lasted 6-8 weeks to 6-9 months before relapse. Of Controls: 2/20 had mild improvement (< 0.001, X 2 ). 104/200 (52%) of PAX-treated ME/CFS patients improved, often within 2-3 days; all relapsed within days to weeks after treatment. 66%, 33% and 44% of CVB4+, CVB3+, non-CVB3,4+ patients responded to treatment, respectively. EVP decreased and increased with clinical response and relapse. Conclusion Rem and PAX demonstrated clinical efficacy in ME/CFS patients with chronic enterovirus infections. Placebo-controlled RCT will be needed to clarify the role of antivirals in ME/CFS. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicViral Infections and Immunology ResearchFrench-language works237,207