MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406924230 · doi:10.1093/cid/ciaf033

Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of an Investigational Maternal Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein–Based Vaccine

2025· article· en· W4406924230 on OpenAlexaff
Peyman Banooni, Bernard Gonik, Cristina Epalza, Osvaldo Reyes, Shabir A. Madhi, Grace Devota Gomez-Go, Khalequ Zaman, Conrado J. Llapur, Eduardo López‐Medina, Thorsten Stanley, Anu Kantele, Li‐Min Huang, Marisa Márcia Mussi‐Pinhata, J DEWULF, Joanne M. Langley, Cláudia Seidl, Martin O. C. Ota, Martha Kirabo, Bruno Anspach, Ilse Dieussaert, Ouzama Henry, Joon Hyung Kim, Marta Picciolato

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunogenicityMedicineVirologyVirusImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In this phase 3 trial of an investigational maternal respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3-Mat), a higher rate of preterm birth was observed in the vaccine (6.8%) versus the placebo group (4.9%). Trial enrollment and vaccination were stopped. Results of investigations into this safety signal were reported previously. Here, we describe end-of-trial efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety results. METHODS: Women 18-49 years old were randomized 2:1 to receive 1 dose of RSVPreF3-Mat (n = 3557) or placebo (n = 1771) at 240/7-340/7 weeks' gestation. Primary outcomes were any and severe medically assessed RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease (MA-RSV-LRTD) in infants until 6 months postbirth and safety until 12 months postbirth. Other efficacy outcomes were evaluated, along with immunogenicity (until 6 months postpartum/birth) and safety in mothers and infants. RESULTS: Efficacy (with 95% credible interval) in infants until 6 months postbirth was 65.5% (37.5%-82.0%) against any MA-RSV-LRTD, 69.0% (33.0%-87.6%) against severe MA-RSV-LRTD, and 50.1% (-3.6% to 75.8%) against RSV hospitalization; it waned over time thereafter. Efficacy against MA-RSV-LRTD was 47.8% (-25.8% to 77.3%) in low- and middle-income and 75.9% (46.1%-91.5%) in high-income countries. RSVPreF3-Mat induced a substantial increase in RSV-A neutralization titers in mothers, with efficient transplacental transfer of antibodies that persisted in infants until at least 6 months postbirth. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the high titers of transplacentally transferred antibodies, this trial suggests a reduced risk of any/severe MA-RSV-LRTD and RSV hospitalization until 6 months postbirth in infants born to mothers immunized with RSVPreF3-Mat during pregnancy. However, vaccine development was terminated due to an identified preterm birth risk. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04605159.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infectious Diseases→Same topicRespiratory viral infections research→French-language works237,207→