MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406926828 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeae333.488

Propensity score-matched analysis in isolated left ventricular dilation and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy

2025· article· en· W4406926828 on OpenAlexaff
Terezinha Valim Oliver Gonçalves, Théo Pezel, Philippe Garot, Solenn Toupin, Suzanne Duhamel, Francesca Sanguineti, Thierry Unterseeh, Thomas Hovasse, Émilie Cornec-Le Gall, L. Hamzi, A Unger, Jean‐Guillaume Dillinger, P. Henry, V. Bousson, Jérôme Garot

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDilated cardiomyopathyCardiologyInternal medicineMedicineDilation (metric space)Ischaemic heart diseaseHeart failureMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction The presence and extent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are strong prognosticators of death in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), defined as left ventricular (LV) dilation and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<50%. Although the current guidelines defined the concept of "isolated LV dilation" (ILVD) as LV dilation with preserved LVEF≥ 50%, the prognostic value of the "LGE granularity" is not established in this population. Purpose To assess the prognostic value of the concept of "LGE granularity" including its extent, location, and pattern for predicting all-cause death above traditional prognosticators in patients with DCM or ILVD, separately. Methods Between 2008 and 2021, all consecutive patients with DCM and ILVD without implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or history of sustained ventricular arrhythmia referred for CMR were included in two centres. The primary outcome was all-cause death using the French National Registry of Death. A propensity score matching was performed to balance characteristics in patients with DCM vs. those with ILVD. Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of each LGE findings. Results Of 2,752 patients analysed (age 52±8 years, 56% male), 15% patients died after a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 9 (7-12) years. A total of 737 (27%) patients had LGE. In the propensity-score matched population (N=1,084 in DCM subgroup and N=1,084 in isolated LV dilation), the LGE presence was associated with death (HR=2.98, 95%CI: 1.97-4.50, p<0.001). In ILVD patients with LGE (N=265), the LGE extent (HR=1.41, 95%CI:1.09-1.83, p=0.009), the presence of LGE in multiple areas (HR=3.86, 95%CI: 1.73-8.61, p<0.001) and the septal location (HR=2.97, 95%CI:1.37-6.46, p=0.006) were strong prognosticators of death after adjustment for traditional prognosticators. Similarly, in DCM patients with LGE (N=268), the LGE extent (HR=1.42, 95% CI:1.07-1.89, p=0.014), the presence of LGE in multiple areas (HR=8.41, 95%CI: 3.32-21.3, p<0.001) and the septal location (HR=6.65, 95% CI: 3.02-14.6, p<0.001) were strongly associated with death. Conclusion The concept of "LGE granularity" was independently associated with all-cause death after adjustment for all traditional prognosticators in both DCM and ILVD. These results suggest that CMR assessment could improve the risk stratification in this population. Survival curves Multivariable analysis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular ImagingSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207