P-1491. Practice variations and clinical outcomes of Intravenous Aminoglycosides in Nontuberculous Mycobacterium infections at three tertiary hospitals in London, Ontario, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The worldwide occurrence of nontuberculous Mycobacterium (NTM) infections is rising. In Canada, there is a continuing surge in infections caused by Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Treating NTM infections is challenging and requires multidrug regimens with antimicrobial susceptibilities to guide therapy. Generally, aminoglycosides have moderate in-vitro activity against NTM isolates. However, the synergistic effect with other antimicrobials makes it an attractive choice for clinicians, especially in the management of severe or refractory cases. The recommended duration of intravenous aminoglycosides is debatable due to side effects and the need for therapeutic monitoring. Moreover, NTMs are becoming more resistant to aminoglycosides. This study aims to assess clinical practice variations in aminoglycoside use among NTM infections in terms of duration and monitoring in London, Canada. Patient Characteristics and Clinical Presentation Methods Retrospective study reviewing the characteristics of 30 patients diagnosed with NTM infection between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2023 in three tertiary care hospitals in London, Ontario, Canada.Table 2:NTM Susceptibility Report Results Mean age at diagnosis was 60.8 years. Seventeen (57%) were male and 13 (43%) were female. The presentations included pulmonary NTM infections in 19 (63%) and skin and soft tissue infections in four (13%). Among all identified species, MAC was the most common. Fifteen (50%) patients received IV aminoglycosides, with 7 (32%) having documented susceptibility to aminoglycosides. Duration of aminoglycoside use varied among patients, ranging from 2 to 24 weeks. Of the patients started on an IV aminoglycoside, 3 (20%) developed ototoxicity and 2 (13%) had acute kidney injury. Serum aminoglycoside levels were checked in 12 (80%), but only 7 patients (47%) had at least one audiology screen. In terms of outcomes, 7 (23%) achieved clinical cure while 9 (30%) had refractory disease, 7 (78%) of which were pulmonary. Two (57%) of the cured patients and 2 (22%) of the refractory patients had received an aminoglycoside. Aminoglycoside Use and Monitoring Conclusion Aminoglycoside use for the treatment of NTMs is variable among clinicians, mostly due to concerns for side effects and the need for consistent drug monitoring, which limits its implementation in outpatient settings. Clinical Outcomes Disclosures Lise Bondy, Assistant Professor, Pfizer: Honoraria|Viiv: Advisor/Consultant Michael Silverman, MD, FRCP, FACP, AAHIVMed, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".