MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406942763 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofae631.372

P-167. New epidemiological routes of Coccidioidomycosis in Mexico – the extension of this pathogen to new areas

2025· article· en· W4406942763 on OpenAlexaff
Eduardo Romo Leija, Carlos Eduardo Maldonado Barrientos, Mercedes Aranda‐Audelo, Dora Edith Corzo Leon, Sebastian Rodriguez Llamazares, Alejandra Hernandez Teran, Fernando Rosalio Morales Villarreal, Gabriel Palma Cortes, Víctor A. Hernández-Hernández, Eduardo Becerril‐Vargas, Víctor Hugo Ahumada-Topete, Marco Villanueva-Reza

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePathogenic organismPathogenEpidemiologyVirologyMicrobiologyImmunologyPathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Due to specific growing conditions, Coccidioidomycosis is a fungal disease typically found in northern Mexico, near California or Arizona. However, due to climate change, there has been an increase in cases in non-endemic areas. In this study, we describe areas where cases of Coccidioidomycosis have been reported, which were previously not known to have this disease. Image of a map of Mexico that highlights both high-risk and low-risk areas. Dots represent origin and migration. Blue circles represent areas where patients lived while yellow represents areas where people migrated. The reason for migration was not studied. Pink circles represent those without travelling. Methods We developed a registry of Coccidioidomycosis cases, which collects data on sociodemographic, travel, and clinical conditions, including tomography, pathology, and outcomes. The patients were categorized into groups based on migration and geographical living area, and we collected data from physical or electronic health records. Results Between 1991 and 2023, we diagnosed 122 patients with coccidioidomycosis. The most common comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (41%) and overweight (24%). Forty-eight patients (39%) living in endemic areas had high-risk working conditions, such as construction, archaeology, and topography. Diagnosis was made using culture in 79.5% of cases, serology in 54%, and biopsy in 51%. CT scans showed predominant nodular (77%) and cavitary lesions (61%). Surprisingly, 46.7% of patients had no risk factors, such as travelling or living in endemic areas. 29.5% of patients had a history of migration as a risk factor to a high-risk area. The average time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 150 days (IC95 61-518 days). The patients were divided into four groups based on their risk factors. 8 (6.5%) lived and travelled in high-risk areas, 19 (15.5%) lived in high-risk areas without migration, 36 (29.5%) lived in low-risk, travelling to high-risk, and 57(46.7%) lived in low-risk and did not travel. Conclusion This division through risk factors highlights areas not known to be at risk, with patients without a history of travelling presenting with Coccidioidomycosis. We estimate an increasing number of fungal infections due to climate change, characterized by increased drought in some areas. As with other diseases, diagnosing Coccidioidomycosis outside of endemic areas should raise awareness of its expansion, and healthcare workers should consider it as a possible differential diagnosis. It is crucial to have this area known to consider resources for treatment. Disclosures Carlos Flores Nunez, PHD, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207