P-2278. CMV Viremia and Disease in Pediatric Liver Transplant Patients: a Multi-national Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia (Defined as a single detectable CMV RNA PCR) and disease (defined as CMV viremia with compatible systemic and/or localized signs and symptoms) remain a leading cause for mortality and morbidity in the pediatric solid organ transplant recipient. This systemic review aims at pooling data from the leading pediatric transplant institutions globally to identify the overall incidence of and risk factors associated with CMV viremia and/or disease in pediatric liver transplant recipients. PRISMA flow diagram Methods A systemic review of Pubmed and OVID databases was conducted since the inception to 01 April 2024. 24 articles were included from the USA, UK, South Africa, India, Japan, Finland, Canada, Turkey, Mexico, Thailand, Greece, Israel and Australia. A total of 1964 liver transplants were included. Median age was 50 months with 47.8% males. Data related to demographics, incidence, donor and recipient CMV serological classification (Donor (D) and Recipient (R)) and risk factors for CMV viremia/disease were extracted from the articles and subsequently analysed. This review was registered in Prospero: CRD42023477476 Results The Incidence of CMV viremia and disease in pediatric liver transplant patients in this review were 34% and 8.4% respectively, with statistically significant higher risk in the CMV D+/R+ category compared to other D/R serologic groups (P value < 0.05). , Additional risk factors identified for CMV viremia/disease included younger age, biliary atresia, high steroid doses, and rejection attacks. Conclusion This meta-analysis highlights that CMV viremia and disease post-liver transplantation are significant health concerns in pediatric populations. Identifying high risk populations for targeted CMV monitoring and potentially preemptive therapy to mitigate CMV-associated morbidity and mortality is a critical cornerstone of pediatric transplant medicine. Further studies are warranted to explore additional risk factors and to refine prevention and treatment strategies for CMV in pediatric transplant recipients. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.012 | 0.020 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".