MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406944765 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofae631.637

P-437. Prevalence of Hepatitis B Co-infection in People with HIV by Birth Cohort– Potential Impact of HBV Vaccination Availability

2025· article· en· W4406944765 on OpenAlexaff
Claire Lee, Tarfa Verinumbe, Anthony T. Fojo, Joyce Jones, Jeanne Keruly, LaQuita N. Snow, Richard D. Moore, Mark Sulkowski, Oluwaseun Falade‐Nwulia

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis B Virus Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCohortVaccinationHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Hepatitis BHepatitis B virusCohort studyVirologyPediatricsImmunologyInternal medicineVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Due to shared modes of transmission, people with HIV (PWH) have disproportionately high rates of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Availability of the HBV vaccine in the US since 1982 and recommendations for universal and catch-up vaccination of infants and children since the 1990s may be associated with lower HBV prevalence among PWH born after 1980. To study how HBV vaccination availability impacted co-infection rates in PWH, we compared the prevalence of active HBV infection at entry into an HIV cohort by birth year groups.Table 1.Baseline characteristics of patients by birth cohort Methods We included PWH from the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort who had HBsAg testing within one year of cohort entry. HBV infection was defined as a positive HBsAg test. Patients were categorized into birth cohorts of 1940-1959, 1960-1979 and 1980-1999 and then further dichotomized to pre- and post-1980 cohorts. Descriptive statistics were used to assess HBsAg prevalence by birth cohort and HIV infection risk factors [men who have sex with men (MSM) and injection drug use (IDU)]. Log binomial regression was used to assess the association of birth cohort (pre-1980 vs post-1980) with HBsAg positivity adjusting for race/ethnicity, HIV infection risk factors (MSM, IDU), baseline viral load, and year of and age at cohort entry.Figure 1.Timeline of HBV vaccination recommendations by the Advisory Committee of Immunization Practices and the corresponding age of patients in pre- and post-1980 birth cohort Results Of the 5608 PWH enrolled in the cohort between 1993 and 2023, 77% were Black, 30% were MSM, and 39% had a history of IDU. Mean age at cohort entry was 39.6 (9.6). Overall HBV prevalence was 6.7% and prevalence by birth cohort was 6.2% (1940-1959), 7.8% (1960-1979) and 2.5% (1980-1999). Among MSM, HBV prevalence was higher at 10.6% (1940-1959), 11.4% (1960-1979) and 2.9% (1980-1999) compared to non-MSM at 5.0% (1940-1959), 6.3% (1960-1979) and 1.8% (1980-1999). HBV prevalence was similar in IDU and non-IDU groups. The risk of HBV infection was significantly lower in the post-1980 birth cohort vs the pre-1980 birth cohort (adjusted RR= 0.17; 95% CI 0.08, 0.34; adjusted RD= -0.06; 95% CI -0.07, -0.04). Conclusion PWH born after 1980 had a lower risk of HBV co-infection than PWH born before 1980, highlighting the potential impact of HBV vaccination on HBV prevalence in PWH. PWH identifying as MSM continue to have disproportionately high HBV prevalence. Additional efforts are needed to implement universal HBV vaccination of adults as recommended in 2021. Disclosures Mark S. Sulkowski, MD, AbbVie: Advisor/Consultant|Aligos Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: Grant/Research Support|Precision Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Vir: Grant/Research Support|Virion: Advisor/Consultant Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia, MBBS ,MPH, Abbvie Inc: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicHepatitis B Virus StudiesFrench-language works237,207