MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406948940 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofae631.210

645. Rapid Versus Conservative Tuberculosis De-isolation Policy Impact Assessment: Province-wide Retrospective Review of 2017-2020, British Columbia, Canada

2025· article· en· W4406948940 on OpenAlexaffabout
Othman Zeyad O Alhekail, Navneet Singh, Elisabeth Hansen, James C. Johnston, Victoria J. Cook, William Connors

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTuberculosisPatient isolationIsolation (microbiology)Family medicineGerontologyPathologyUniversity hospitalBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global health threat. Upon diagnosis, patients with pulmonary TB are required to undergo specific isolation precautions to prevent further disease transmission. Current practice typically mandates isolation for at least two weeks post-diagnosis, with extended periods for those found to have positive sputum acid fast bacilli (AFB) smear results. The most recent Canadian Tuberculosis Standards (2022) and other international groups have suggested that the decision to discontinue TB airborne isolation should be made based on length of effective treatment rather than bacteriological endpoint (i.e. Sputum AFB results and culture results). Sputum-based (Conservative) de-isolation determination Methods This is a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed drug susceptible pulmonary TB cases between 2017 and 2020 in British Columbia, Canada. By comparing rapid (defined in Table 1) and conservative (defined in Table 2) isolation determination policies, and estimating recommended isolation periods for each, we aim to quantify isolation periods and assess whether adopting the rapid de-isolation determination protocol would significantly reduce airborne isolation durations. Treatment based (Rapid) de-isolation determination Results We identified a total of 952 cases with drug susceptible pulmonary TB. Among the 952, the mean age was 54 years (SD 22). With regards to sputum AFB smear status, 351 (37%) had a negative AFB smear at baseline and 355 (37%) remained sputum AFB smear positive for over 90 days (did not meet conservative de-isolation criteria). Among the remaining 246 cases, 82 converted their AFB smear status to negative within less than 28 days from the first positive sputum AFB smear sample. Based on sputum AFB smear status alone, we found that rapid de-isolation determination would have resulted in a median of 10 (IQR 62) fewer days of isolation. Conclusion Adopting a rapid de-isolation determination protocol would result in substantial reductions of isolation durations for patients with drug-susceptible pulmonary TB. Updated evidence-based TB de-isolation guidelines emphasizing effective treatment duration, such as the new recommendation from the National TB Coalition of America, can significantly reduce patients' harm and health system costs of unnecessarily prolonged isolation. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207