MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406951529 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1471

P-1290. Invasive group A streptococcal infection in children in Toronto, Canada

2025· article· en· W4406951529 on OpenAlexaffabout
Halima Dabaja Younis, Jennie Johnstone, Zoë Zhong, Caroline Kassee, Vanessa Allen, Irene Armstrong, Mahin Baqi, Kevin R. Barker, Ari Bitnun, Sergio Borgia, Aaron Campigotto, Sumon Chakrabarti, Wayne L. Gold, Alyssa Golden, Christopher Kandel, Ian Kitai, Julianne V. Kus, Liane Macdonald, Irene Martín, Matthew Muller, Jeya Nadarajah, Daniel Ricciuto, David Richardson, Medina Saffie, Manal Tadros, Monali Varia, Kazi Hassan, Maxime Lefebvre, Angel Li, Asfia Sultana, Gloria Crowl, Lubna Farooqi, Mare Pejkovska, Nadia Shamshad Malik, Shiva Barati, Tamara Vikulova, Allison McGeer

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsLakeridge HealthJoseph Brant HospitalUniversity of ManitobaPublic Health OntarioHospital for Sick ChildrenTrillium Health CentreWilliam Osler Health SystemToronto Public HealthToronto East General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSTREPTOCOCCAL INFECTIONSPediatricsImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Rising cases of invasive group A streptococcus (iGAS) in children have been reported globally. We assessed the epidemiology of pediatric iGAS over three decades. The annual incidence of invasive GAS infections in children in Toronto and Peel Region during the years 1992-2023 Methods Since 1992, the Toronto Invasive Bacterial Diseases Network has conducted surveillance for iGAS in Toronto/Peel Region, Canada. The National Microbiology Laboratory provides emm typing, and Statistics Canada supplies population data. iGAS data were analyzed by age group—toddlers (0-4 yrs), young children (5-9 yrs), and older children (10-17 yrs)— and over time from 1992 to 2024. emm types in pediatric cases per 100,000 population in Toronto and Peel Region from 1992 to 2023. Results 506 pediatric iGAS cases were identified. Figure 1 shows the incidence by age group. 61% of cases were male; 33% had underlying conditions. Main presentations were soft tissue infection (30%), bacteremia with no focus (22%), bone/joint infections (20%) and pneumonia (16%). Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) occurred in 5.7% of cases, and necrotizing fasciitis (NF) in 2.6%. Positive blood cultures were found in 71% of cases, with additional sterile site cultures in 20%. emm1 (42%) and emm12 (16%) were the most common types (Figure 2), with M1UK comprising 63% of emm1 isolates in 2022/2023. During the period of pandemic restrictions (Mar 2020-Apr 2022), iGAS cases declined, and emm1 disappeared. As restrictions eased, emm1 and, to a lesser extent, emm12 rebounded (Figure 3). Seasonality, with increased winter/spring cases, became more pronounced (Figure 4). Toddlers had higher rates of bacteremia without focus (27% vs. 14%, p=0.01) and emm12 (20% vs. 8.4%, p=0.02) than older children. Younger children had higher rates of bone/joint infections than toddlers (28% vs. 16%, p=0.004). Rates of STSS, NF, and 30-day mortality were consistent across age groups and time, with no association to specific emm types, except for higher mortality in emm4 [12.5% vs. 3.6%, OR 3.8 (1.2-12.1)]. Increasing pneumonia rates over time were associated with emm1. In multivariate analysis, pneumonia [OR 7.2 (2.9-17.6)], NF [OR 15.5 (4.2-58)], and increased age [OR 1.8 (1.03-3.2)] predicted STSS. Monthly pediatric iGAS cases in relation to pandemic public health restrictions in Toronto and Peel Region from April 2018 to March 2024. Conclusion The recent rise in pediatric iGAS infections is a public health concern. Incidence has increased, but severity remains unchanged. emm1 transmission seems more susceptible to control by public health measures. Continuous surveillance is essential. Seasonality of iGAS in children in Toronto/Peel region, 1992-2023 Disclosures Allison McGeer, MD, AstraZeneca: Honoraria|GSK: Honoraria|Merck: Honoraria|Moderna: Honoraria|Novavax: Honoraria|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Roche: Honoraria|Seqirus: Grant/Research Support|Seqirus: Honoraria

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicStreptococcal Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207