MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406951675 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofae631.261

P-54. High Dose Intramuscular Influenza Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Patients. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4406951675 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Rahimi Shahmirzadi, Meisam Abdar Esfahani, Rachel Couban, Sameer Elsayed, Michael E. Silverman

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntramuscular injections and effects
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research InstituteMcMaster UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisSolid organIntensive care medicineInternal medicineVirologyOrgan transplantationTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Seasonal influenza can cause serious illness and even death, especially in immunocompromised people such as solid organ transplant recipients (SOT). Early results from some studies show that high dose (HD) intramuscular (IM) vaccine might help boost the body's immune response in transplant patients. Given the uncertain benefits and harms associated with various IM vaccine doses a synthetized appraisal of the evidence is warranted.Figure 1:Seroconversion rate in Influenza A(H1N1) (SC H1N1) Forest plot Methods Randomized controlled trials of adults who underwent SOT and received IM influenza vaccine and compared , IM influenza HD vaccine with standard dose. The outcomes of interests are seroconversion rate (SCR) for H1N1,H3N2, and graft rejection after vaccination. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL until Jan 2024. Screening, data extraction, risk of bias and certainty of evidence assessment were assessed by two reviewers.Figure 2:Seroconversion rate in Influenza A (H3N2) (SC H3N2) Forest plot Results Pooling data from the 5 studies (1281 patients) shows moderate quality of evidence in the SCR towards using HD influenza vaccine in H1N1 type and high-quality evidence for H3N2 type . (RR 1.87 (1.25 to 2.79), RR 1.54 [1.31 to 1.80]). Analysis of five studies indicated that HD influenza vaccine results in no difference in graft rejection. (RR 0.73 [0.37 to 1.45]). High quality evidence showed that HD influenza vaccine reduce serious adverse events in SOT patients. (RR 0.71 [0.52 to 0.96]). Data from three studies shows HD influenza vaccine may results in little to no difference in confirmed clinically influenza. (low certainty of evidence) (RR 1.16 [0.58 to 2.29]).Figure 3:Graft rejection (GR) Forest plot Conclusion Our systematic review indicates that HD influenza vaccine probably increases SCR in H1N1 and increases SCR in H3N2.HD vaccine, also may not increase graft rejection and reduces serious adverse events in SOT patients. GRADE Summary of Findings (SoF) Table Disclosures Reza Rahimi Shahmirzadi, MD, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Meisam Abdar Esfahani, MD, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Michael Silverman, MD, FRCP, FACP, AAHIVMed, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicIntramuscular injections and effectsFrench-language works237,207