MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406961028 · doi:10.1021/jacs.4c14676

Activating Redox Chemistry of Quinones for High Energy Density Aqueous Sodium-Ion Batteries

2025· article· en· W4406961028 on OpenAlexaff
Yizhong Gou, Nini Liu, Yu Peng, Jingwen Zhang, Jian Peng, Jiantao Han, Yunhui Huang, Chun Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChemistryAqueous solutionRedoxIonSodiumEnergy densityInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anode materials with high capacity and suitable redox potential are crucial for improving the energy density of aqueous sodium-ion batteries (ASIBs). And organic anode materials play a promising role due to their tunable electrochemical performance. However, the insufficient electroactive sites lead to a low capacity, hindering the elevation of energy density. Thus, it is essential to design organic molecules with multiple redox-active sites. Herein, we propose a strategy to activate redox sites by regulating the spatial distribution of delocalized electrons within the conjugation system, and the quinone rings are successfully activated as new reversible Na-ion storage sites via enhancing the electron density. The obtained 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoquinonatocobalt (Co-DHBQ) with electroactive quinone rings exhibits a superior capacity of 183 mA h g –1 accompanied by a multiple-electron transfer. Benefiting from the high capacity, the Co-DHBQ||Na 2 Mn[Fe(CN) 6 ]·2H 2 O (MnHCF) full cell outputs a ultrahigh energy density of 110 W h kg –1 (based on the total active material mass of the anode and cathode) with a lifespan of 3000 cycles. This work proposes a strategy to activate new redox sites, providing a new impetus for designing high-performance organic electrode materials and developing high energy density ASIBs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical Society→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→